Monolithic catalysts for conversion of sulfur dioxide to sulfur trioxide

ABSTRACT

Chemically and thermally stable monolithic catalysts are disclosed having platinum or alkali metal-vanadium active phases for use in the conversion of sulfur dioxide to sulfur trioxide. The platinum catalyst comprises a foraminous ceramic support which has at its wall surfaces a high surface area substrate for an active catalyst phase, and a combination of a platinum active phase and a promoter on the substrate. The substrate preferably comprises silica, provided, for example, by application of a silica washcoat. The promoter is selected from among compounds of zirconium, hafnium and titanium. 
     The alkali-vanadium catalyst comprises a foraminous ceramic support having a porous silica substrate for the active phase at its foraminal wall surfaces. An alkali metal-vanadium active catalyst is in the pores of the porous silica. 
     Methods for producing the catalysts of the invention are described, as is a method for producing sulfur trioxide with the platinum catalyst, in which the catalyst is regenerated with a mineral acid when activity has declined through aging or exposure to the conditions of the oxidation of sulfur dioxide.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This is a continuation-in-part of Ser. No. 531,003 filed May 31, 1990and now abandoned.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to the catalytic oxidation of sulfur dioxide tosulfur trioxide and to monolithic or honeycomb catalysts for theoxidation reaction. The invention particularly relates to improvedmonolithic catalysts and to sulfur acid manufacturing processes in whichmonolithic catalysts are used in preliminary contact stages and aparticulate catalyst is used in the final stage.

Sulfuric acid is typically produced by catalytic gas phase oxidation ofsulfur dioxide to sulfur trioxide [Eq. (1)] followed by hydration of thesulfur trioxide product to form sulfuric acid [Eq. (2)].

    SO.sub.2 +1/2O.sub.2 →SO.sub.3                      ( 1)

    SO.sub.3 +H.sub.2 O →H.sub.2 SO.sub.4               ( 2)

Eq. (1) proceeds at useful rates over solid particulate catalystscontaining alkali-vanadium or platinum active phases. Typical gasconcentrations of SO₂ at the inlet to the first pass of catalyst rangefrom 4 to 13%. With adiabatic operation of each pass of the converter,four passes of catalyst are generally necessary to achieve overall SO₂conversions in excess of 99.7%. Heat exchangers precede each pass inorder to cool the gas stream to the desired inlet temperature to thecatalyst bed. Conversions of at least 99.7% of the original SO₂concentration are obtained through a double absorption design in whichSO₃ is removed from the gas stream through acid irrigated absorptiontowers that follow the second [2:2 interpass absorption (IPA) design] orthird (3:1 IPA design) pass of catalyst in the converter.

Various monolithic catalysts have been proposed for use in lieu ofparticulate catalysts in the contact process for the manufacture ofsulfuric acid.

Monolithic catalysts are comprised of a ceramic honeycomb or otherforaminous support having a high surface area substrate at the foraminalwall surfaces of the support, and a promoter and active catalyst phaseon the substrate. Such high surface area substrate is provided, forexample, by application of an alumina or silica washcoat to a honeycombof mullite or the like. Alternatively, a mixture of high and lowporosity silica powders is extruded to produce the honeycomb support,the high surface area silica providing the high surface area substrateat the surfaces of the foraminal walls of the honeycomb. This substrategenerally exhibits both high surface area and high porosity. An activephase for the oxidation of sulfur dioxide is deposited on the substratethrough adsorption of platinum from soluble precursor salts orimpregnation of a porous substrate with soluble alkali and vanadiumsalts.

Platinum catalysts on both particulate and monolithic substrates havebeen suggested in the art for conversion of sulfur dioxide to sulfurtrioxide. Platinum-containing active phases supported on particulatesfor the oxidation of SO₂ are well known. Examples of platinum supportedon silica gels for the catalytic oxidation of sulfur dioxide are given,for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 1,683,694, 1,935,188, and 2,005,412. Inthese patents a platinum precursor salt is typically impregnated ontothe particulate support then treated with a reducing gas such ashydrogen sulfide in order to "fix" the platinum active phase on thesupport prior to calcination. Promoter materials have been previouslyused with platinum on particulate catalysts. U.S. Pat. No. 2,005,412uses promoter materials that include the elements aluminum, manganese,iron, nickel, copper, bismuth, molybdenum, beryllium, vanadium, tin, andchromium. U.S. Pat. No. 2,200,522 includes promoter species with theelements arsenic, vanadium, magnesium, chromium, and iron. U.S. Pat. No.2,418,851 reports the use of palladium with platinum on a magnesiumsulfate or aluminum oxide carrier.

The deposition of a high surface area washcoat onto a low surface areaceramic honeycomb substrate is described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 2,742,437 and3,824,196. It is generally known in the art that monolithic catalystscan be used at gas velocities higher than those used with particulatecatalysts (i.e., greater than 120 standard linear feet per minute, SLFM)as a consequence of higher geometric surface area per unit volume,higher concentration of the active phase near the catalyst surface tominimize mass and heat transfer to and from the gas phase, and muchlower pressure drop per unit volume. Both oxidation rate and pressuredrop constraints are less stringent for monolithic catalysts than forconventional particulate catalysts. The performance properties intrinsicto the monolithic structure are compared in detail to those ofparticulate catalysts by J. P. DeLuca and L. E. Campbell in "AdvancedMaterials in Catalysis," J. J. Burton and R. L. Garten, Eds., AcademicPress, New York, 1977, pages 312-318.

U.S. Pat. No. 3,518,206 describes the preparation of monolithiccatalysts comprising a colloidal silica washcoat onto which is depositedactive catalytic material selected from a group that includes elementalPt. A variety of catalyst structures are described for a wide variety ofapplications, and numerous different active phase materials aredescribed and exemplified. Examples in this patent describe coating a 20to 40 mesh SO₂ oxidation catalyst containing potassium, vanadium, iron,and silica on a honeycomb material through the use of colloidal silica(15%, 7 millimicron particle size). Another example describes dipping analuminum honeycomb in a slurry of alumina and colloidal silica, andthereafter depositing platinum from chloroplatinic acid on the resultantalumina/silica coating. The catalyst so produced is said to be usefulfor oxidations of carbon monoxide to carbon dioxide, hydrogen to water,for the reduction of nitrogen oxides, and for various hydrogenationreactions.

U.S. Pat. No. 3,554,929 discloses preparation of monolithic catalystswith a high surface area coating derived from colloidal alumina. Themonolith may be in the form of a honeycomb. Active catalysts, such asPt, are deposited on the alumina coated support.

U.S. Pat. No. 4,098,722 describes a method for making a catalyst bodyfrom corrugated metal sheets of an aluminum-containing ferritic steel.An alumina washcoat carrier is applied to the catalyst body followed bydeposition of an active catalytic material such as Pt.

U.S. Pat. No. 4,744,967 describes a process for exhaust gas purificationthat includes an oxidation catalyst for SO₂. An example discloses thatthe oxidation catalysts consist of honeycomb bodies with a cell densityof 100 cells per square inch (cpsi) and an α-Al₂ O₃ coating onto whichfinely distributed platinum is deposited at 70.8 grams of Pt per ft³.Sulfuric acid of 77-80% strength is produced in a single step by Passingan SO₂ -containing gas over the catalyst at a space velocity of 7500/hr,420°-460° c. inlet temperature, and 20 to 50 mg/m³ dust after anelectrofilter.

German Pat. DE 39 10 249 discloses a process for the production of acatalyst for the oxidation of sulfur dioxide gas that includes V₂ O₅, apotassium salt, diatomaceous earth, and a sodium polyacrylate binder.Addition of water to this catalyst mixture allows it to be extruded toobtain a honeycomb-like form.

Meissner U.S. Pat. No. 4,539,309 describes catalysts for the oxidationof sulfur dioxide to sulfur trioxide that are prepared by dissolvingvanadium pentoxidein an alkali solution, acidifying the solution withsulfuric acid, mixing the acidified solution with a carrier, molding orextruding the mixture, and drying and calcining the molding orextrudate. Working examples describe particulate extrudates havingdiameters of 6 mm.

Certain of the monolithic catalysts known to the prior art have beensubject to thermal degradation, for example, by sintering of the activephase, at the temperatures of conversion of sulfur dioxide to sulfurtrioxide. Initially highly active, they lose activity rapidly incommercial operation. Other catalysts provide a level of activity untilcontaminated by reaction byproducts or dusts contained in the reactiongases, but lack the chemical stability necessary for effectiveregeneration of the catalyst. Consequently, there has been anunfulfilled need in the art for monolithic catalysts which provide forhigh rates of conversion but are both thermally and chemically stable.

U.S. Pat. No. 3,259,459 describes a process for the production of SO₃using either vanadium or platinum catalysts. The SO₂ -containing gasstream is partially converted to SO₃ in the first pass, then the SO₃ isabsorbed through an interpass absorption step. In the subsequent passthe converted SO₂ -containing gas stream from which the SO₃ was removedis passed into the next catalyst bed at a temperature of at least 20° C.below that in the preceding pass. Interpass absorption is a commonpractice in the art, as further illustrated, for example, by thedisclosures of U.S. Pat. Nos. 1,789,460, and 3,142,536.

U.S. Pat. No. 3,963,423 discloses a high gas throughput process for theconversion of SO₂ to SO₃. Each pass of catalyst contains at least threecatalyst trays that are arranged either horizontally or verticallybeside one another.

U.S. Pat. No. 3,987,153 describes an integrated process for thereduction of SO₂ emissions from a single absorption sulfuric acid plantconsisting of multi-stage oxidation of SO₂. In at least the final pass,a cesium-containing particulate catalyst is loaded. Following absorptionof the SO₃ from the gas stream, residual SO₂ is scrubbed by means ofaqueous hydrogen peroxide and/or sulfur-containing peroxy acids.

UK Pat. Appl. GB 2,081,239 describes a catalytic oxidation process forproducing SO₃ from SO₂ that uses monolithic catalyst. An SO₂ - and O₂-containing gas stream is passed through the monolithic catalyst at asuperficial gas velocity of at least 500 actual ft./min. The monolithiccatalyst has an open cross-sectional area of at least 50% with open gasflow passages of at least 50 per square inch of cross-sectional area.

German Pat. DE 39 11 889 describes a contact process for the productionof sulfuric acid that uses a catalyst arranged in one or more layers.The catalyst has several honeycomb-shaped openings with equivalentdiameters between 3 and 15 mm and an open volume ratio between 40 and70%. The catalyst is contained in a tube from which branch passagesbetween the catalyst layers are located. These passages remove hotconverted gases to heat exchangers after which the cooled gases arereturned to the next catalyst layer in the tube.

In an effort to achieve economies of scale, sulfuric acid plants oftenare built with capacities of 2000 to 3000 short tons (ST)/day (as 100%H₂ SO₄) The SO₂ gas composition is in the range of 10 to 11% by volumeor higher. This rate of production leads to relatively large diameter(often 30 to 40 feet or more) reactor vessels containing catalystloadings on the order of 30 to 50 liters/short ton (L/ST) (as 100% H₂SO₄) or more per pass. Current regulations on SO₂ emissions levels fromsulfuric acid plants often require that 99.7% or more of the SO₂ fed tothe first pass of the reactor be converted to SO₃ On the basis of theprior art, there is an unfilled need for a sulfuric acid process thatgives high rates of H₂ SO₄ production, affords significantly lowercatalyst loadings in the upper passes, and at the same time, permitshigh levels of overall SO₂ conversion that equal or exceed 99.7% in afour-pass process.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Among the several objects of the present invention, therefore, are theprovision of a novel monolithic catalyst for the oxidation of sulfurdioxide to sulfur trioxide; the provision of such a catalyst whichoperates at high gas velocity with relatively low pressure drop theprovision of such a catalyst which provides a high rate of conversion ofsulfur dioxide to sulfur trioxide; the provision of such a catalystwhich is resistant to active phase sintering and other forms of thermaldegradation: the provision of such a catalyst which is chemicallystable; the provision of such a catalyst which may be readilyregenerated and reused; and the provision of methods for the preparationof such a catalyst.

It is a further object of this invention is to provide a general processfor high rates of conversion of sulfur dioxide to sulfur trioxide overan economical number catalyst passes operated at higher gas velocitythan conventional sulfuric acid plants. It is a particular object of theinvention to provide such a process which may be implemented using areactor vessel for several stages which is of small diameter in relationto those required for a conventional sulfuric acid process having agiven production capacity.

Briefly, therefore, the present invention is directed to a monolithiccatalyst for the conversion of sulfur dioxide to sulfur trioxidecomprising a foraminous monolithic ceramic support. The support has atthe foraminal wall surfaces thereof a high surface area substrate for anactive catalyst phase. On the substrate is a combination of a platinumactive phase and a promoter. The promoter being selected from the groupconsisting of a compound of zirconium, a compound of litanium or acompound of hafnium.

The invention is also directed to a monolithic catalyst generally of theaforesaid type in which the substrate comprises high surface areasilica.

The invention is further directed to a monolithic catalyst for theconversion of sulfur dioxide to sulfur trioxide comprising a foraminousmonolithic support having at the foraminal wall surfaces thereof a highporosity silica substrate for an active catalyst phase. An alkalimetal-vanadium active phase is in the pores of the high porosity silica.

Further comprehended by the invention is a monolithic catalyst for theconversion of sulfur dioxide to sulfur trioxide comprising a foraminousmonolithic ceramic support, a silica washcoat on the foraminal wallsurfaces of the support, and a platinum active phase on the washcoat.The silica washcoat is bound to the foraminal wall surfaces of thesupport by a calcined silica sol.

Also included in the invention is a monolithic catalyst for theconversion of sulfur dioxide to sulfur trioxide comprising a foraminousmonolithic ceramic support, the support having at the foraminal wallsurfaces thereof a high surface area substrate for an active catalystphase. On the substrate is a highly dispersed platinum active phase, theplatinum active phase having been deposited on the substrate from asolution containing a precursor complex selected from among Pt(NH₃)₄ ⁺⁺and Pt(SO₃)₂ OH³⁻.

The invention is further directed to a method for the preparation of amonolithic catalyst for the conversion of sulfur dioxide to sulfurtrioxide. In accordance with the method, a washcoat slurry and a sol ofa promoter are applied to the foraminal wall surfaces of a foraminousmonolithic support that is permeable to high velocity flow of a gascontaining sulfur dioxide and oxygen. The washcoat slurry comprises ahigh surface area silica in a sol, and the promoter comprises an oxideor silicate of zirconium, hafnium or titanium. The washcoat slurry andthe promoter sol are dried to produce a green washcoat and a promoter onthe surfaces of the foraminal walls. The green washcoat and promoter arecalcined, thereby providing a substrate on the foraminal wall surfacesfor an active catalyst phase. Platinum is deposited on the substrate.

Further contemplated by the invention is a process for the preparationof a monolithic catalyst comprising a foraminous support which has beenproduced by co-extrusion of a high surface area and a low surface areasilica, the support being permeable to high velocity flow of a gascontaining sulfur dioxide and oxygen. A sol of a promoter is applied tothe foraminal wall surfaces of the support, the promoter comprising anoxide or silicate of a metal selected from among zirconium, hafnium andtitanium. The promoter sol is dried to deposit a promoter on thesurfaces of the foraminal walls of the support, and the promoter iscalcined on such surfaces, thereby providing a substrate for a catalystactive phase. This substrate comprises the promoter and the high surfacearea silica. An active catalyst for the conversion of sulfur dioxide tosulfur trioxide is deposited on the substrate.

The invention is further directed to a process for the preparation ofsulfur trioxide. In the process, a gas containing sulfur dioxide andoxygen is contacted with a monolithic catalyst for the oxidation ofsulfur dioxide to sulfur trioxide. The catalyst comprises a foraminousmonolithic ceramic support, the support having at its foraminal wallsurfaces a high surface area silica substrate for an active catalystphase and, on the substrate, an active phase selected from amongplatinum and alkali metal-vanadium. After a decline in the activity ofsaid catalyst is incurred due to aging or exposure to the conditions ofoxidation of sulfur dioxide to sulfur trioxide, the catalyst iscontacted with a mineral acid to regenerate its activity, therebyproducing a regenerated catalyst. Preparation of sulfur trioxide isresumed by contacting a gas containing sulfur dioxide and oxygen withthe regenerated catalyst.

The invention is further directed to a process for the manufacture ofsulfuric acid in which a gas stream comprising sulfur dioxide and oxygenis passed through a plurality of preliminary contacting stages, in eachof which the gas is contacted with a monolithic catalyst comprising aplatinum active phase, thereby converting a substantial fraction of thesulfur dioxide in the gas stream to sulfur trioxide. The gas streamleaving one of the plurality of preliminary contacting stages iscontacted with sulfuric acid in an absorption zone to remove sulfurtrioxide from the stream by absorption in the sulfuric acid. Afterhaving passed through the plurality of preliminary stages and theabsorption zone, the gas stream is passed through a final contactingstage in which it is contacted with a particulate catalyst comprisingvanadium and cesium, thereby substantially converting residual sulfurdioxide in the gas to sulfur trioxide.

Other objects and features will be in part apparent and in part pointedout hereinafter.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIGS. 1-5 contain electron microscopy data on a monolithic catalyst ofthe invention, showing discrete Pt deposits and a lattice provided by azirconia promoter; and

FIG. 6 is a flow sheet illustrating a novel process of the invention inwhich the catalysts of the invention can be used.

Corresponding reference figures indicate corresponding parts in theseveral views of the drawings.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

Monolithic catalysts of this invention have been demonstrated to be veryeffective oxidation of sulfur dioxide-containing gas streams. Inparticular, the monolithic catalysts show improved performancecharacteristics over those of particulate catalysts, including highermass and heat transfer, lower pressure drop per unit volume, andexcellent physical stability. Use of the catalyst having thesecharacteristics allows greater throughputs of SO₂ -containing gasstreams and lower capital costs per unit of SO₃ manufacturing capacity.Relative to the monolithic catalysts of the prior art, the monolithiccatalysts of this invention have high activity per unit volume for theoxidation of SO₂ to SO₃, improved thermal and, at least in someinstances, chemical stability, and the capability for regeneration andreuse.

Physical stability of the monolithic catalyst is defined by retentionover a period of service of a combination of features that includemechanical stability of the monolithic support, porosity of themonolithic surface, and microstructure of the supported active phase.These factors can be measured through various tests. Mechanicalstability of the monolithic structure is measured through axial crushingstrength or the modulus of rupture. Retention of porosity and catalystmicrostructure is assessed through a combination of tests on themonolithic catalysts for thermal and chemical stability.

Monolithic catalysts of the invention are composite materials comprisinga foraminous support having cells, pores or channels through which gasmay flow at high velocity and low pressure drop, a high surface areasubstrate and a promoter for a catalyst active phase at the foraminalwall surfaces of the support, and an active catalyst phase comprisingplatinum, or an alkali metal vanadium composition. Preferably, thesupport comprises a honeycomb shape which may have various cell shapesand diameters, but whose cells or pores are large enough so that thesupport is permeable to a gas flowing at high velocity. On the foraminalwall surfaces is a substrate for the active phase, the substratecomprising a finely porous (often microporous) surface coating which iseither an integral part of the honeycomb support, as generated in thepreparation of the support, or is provided subsequently by way of awashcoat film. An integral high surface area substrate is provided atthe foraminal wall surfaces where the support is produced byco-extrusion of a high surface area/high porosity together with a lowersurface area/lower porosity silica.

Where a washcoat is used, a washcoat slurry is prepared comprising thehigh surface area silica in a film-forming sol comprising silica,zirconia, titania or the like. The washcoat slurry is applied to theforaminal walls of the support, then dried to produce a green washcoat.The green washcoat is calcined, causing the high surface area silica tobecome bound to the foraminal wall surfaces by an adhesive film producedby drying and calcination of the sol.

Preferably, the promoter is also applied in the form of a sol. It may beapplied over the high surface area silica substrate or, in the case of awashcoat, incorporated in the washcoat slurry. In the latter instance,the washcoat slurry may comprise the high surface area silica dispersedin a mixed sol comprising both silica and said promoter, or the promotersol may serve by itself as the binder for the high surface area silica.

Suitable supports or substrates for the preparation of monolithiccatalysts of this invention are preferably ceramic thin-walled honeycombstructures with low surface areas. Representative methods for themanufacture of such materials are given in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,790,654 and4,364,888, the disclosures of which are expressly incorporated herein byreference. Materials suitable for such foraminous supports includealumina, cordierite (orthorhombic magnesium aluminum metasilicate; Mg₂Al₄ O₃ (SiO₃)₅), mullite (3Al₂ O₃ *SiO₂), mullite-aluminum titanate, andtitania. A preferred material for use in this invention is mullite, inparticular, Corning Celcor Code 9494. Nominal cell densities of mullitehoneycomb substrate include 9, 16, 25, 50, 100, 200, 300, and 400 cellper square inch (cpsi). For this invention, the preferred cell densityis between about 100 and about 400 cpsi of a cross section takentransverse to the direction of flow through the catalyst. Mostpreferably, the cell density is between about 100 and about 300 cpsiwith square cells, although the choice may vary with the specificapplication. The permeability of the foraminous support is such that thepressure drop of a gas containing sulfur dioxide, oxygen and nitrogenflowing at a velocity of 600 standard feet per minute through amonolithic catalyst comprising such support is not greater than about 8inches water per lineal foot in the direction of flow. Typically theforaminous void fraction of the monolith is in the range of betweenabout 0.25 and about 0.75.

An alternative to the above-described honeycomb supports is providedthrough the use of monolithic supports that combine a high porosityoxide with a low surface area oxide to produce a composite material thatpossesses the permeability necessary for gas flow, the fine porosityneeded for effective catalyst activity and the mechanical strengthconferred through the use of a low surface area oxide. Typical materialsfor the preparation of these silica composite honeycombs include a lowdensity, high porosity silica powder with below 20 microns averageparticle size; a low surface area silica with particles having aparticle size between about 20 and about 74 microns such as SUPERSILsilica from Pennsylvania Glass Sands Co.; and a silicone resin such asDow Corning Resin Q6-2230. A plasticized mixture (or "dough") suitablefor extrusion is made through the addition of an aqueous phasecomprising water and a lower alcohol such as, for example, isopropylalcohol. Further details on the composite monolithic supports of thistype are given in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,631,267, 4,631,268, and 4,637,995,the disclosures of which are expressly incorporated herein by reference.The preferred material for the monolithic catalysts of this invention issilica extruded in nominally 100 to 300 cpsi with square cells. Thesecomposite silica supports have total pore volumes from 0.25 to 0.50 mL/gwith surface areas from 15 to 50 m² /g. Higher pore volumes (0.50 to0.75 mL/g) can be obtained, but the resulting silica monolithic supportslack adequate mechanical strength. As reported in U.S. Pat. No.4,631,267, mechanical strength is adequate where the modulus of ruptureis greater than 500 pounds per square inch (psi). The high porositysilica component of the silica composite monolithic support can beselected from several silica powders with high surface areas (100 to 500m² /g) or silicas with low surface areas (below 10 m² /g) but high porevolumes such as diatomaceous earths. These silica honeycombs can be usedwith either platinum or alkali-vanadium active phases. Table I providesa listing of representative composite silica honeycombs prepared by theabove referenced methods. These 200 cpsi honeycombs are characterized bythe mercury

                                      TABLE I                                     __________________________________________________________________________    Honeycomb Code.sup.a                                                                     LBU-500/1000                                                                          LBU-1000                                                                            LFC-1000                                                                            LFD-1000                                                                            HOT-1000G                                                                            HOT-1000S                         Honeycomb Number                                                                         4269771A                                                                              4269771B                                                                            4344421C                                                                            4344421D                                                                            3740999A                                                                             3998931B                          __________________________________________________________________________    Total Intrusion                                                                          0.303   0.309 0.375 0.419 0.390  0.361                             Volume,.sup.b mL/g                                                            Total Pore Area,.sup.b                                                                   22.2    22.8  16.9  40.1  36.1   20.6                              m.sup.2 /g                                                                    Median Pore                                                                              0.370   0.387 0.564 0.633 0.420  0.524                             Diameter,.sup.b μm                                                         Average Pore                                                                              0.0548  0.0541                                                                              0.0887                                                                              0.0418                                                                              0.0432                                                                               0.0699                           Diameter,.sup.b μm                                                         Bulk Density,.sup.b                                                                      1.38    1.44  1.28  1.25  1.26   1.26                              g/mL                                                                          Water Pore 0.29    0.29  0.30  0.35  0.33   0.34                              Volume,.sup.c cc/g                                                            __________________________________________________________________________     .sup.a These honeycombs all have square cells with about 200 cells per        square inch.                                                                  .sup.b Determined through mercury intrusion porosimetry using a               Micrometrics Autopore 9220II.                                                 .sup.c Determined through modification of ASTM Method C12784, "Standard       Test Method for Specific Gravity and Absorption of Coarse Aggregate."         Values shown represent averages multiple determinations.                 

intrusion porosimetry and water absorption data given. Honeycombs codedLFC-1000 and LFD-1000 were prepared using 10 and 20% diatomaceous earth,respectively.

Composite silica honeycombs exhibit a very wide range of surface area atthe foraminal walls of the support. Where a high surface area/highporosity silica is used in the preparation of the honeycomb, the surfacearea may range from 100 to 400 m² per gram of the monolith, with a porevolume of 0.5 to 2 cc/g. However, where diatomaceous earth is used, thesurface area may range as low as 2 m² /g, with a porosity in the rangeof 1 cc/g.

In the acidic environment encountered by catalysts for the oxidation ofsulfur dioxide, silica-based supports are beneficial because of theirchemical stability under these conditions. The silica honeycombs aboveare representative of a preferred type of support for active phases forthe oxidation of SO₂, especially when prepared using a diatomaceousearth component for porosity in the composite honeycomb material and analkali-vanadium active phase. As noted in U.S. Pat. No. 4,631,267, theseall-silica monolithic supports are attractive alternatives to washcoatedhoneycombs where in a high dust- and particulate-containing gas stream,the washcoat can become removed from the underlying monolithic support.However, a silica-containing washcoat applied to a mullite honeycombsupport yields a very effective substrate for a platinum active phase.Furthermore, it has been found that the platinum-washcoated mullitecatalyst has exceptional thermal and chemical stability. This catalystis prepared through deposition of a silica powder as a thin film ontothe surface of the honeycomb. This method of deposition after drying andcalcination leads to the formation of a high surface area washcoat atthe macropore surfaces of the ceramic honeycomb support. The washcoatsubstrate is bound to the support by a film obtained by calcination ofthe sol slurry from which the washcoat is deposited. The high surfacearea of the substrate is essential for thermal stability of the platinumactive phase which, as described below, is produced in high dispersionon the monolithic catalyst. The general "washcoat" concept is discussedin U.S. Pat. Nos. 2,742,437 and 3,824,196, expressly incorporated hereinby reference.

A key component to an effective washcoat composition in terms ofadhesion to the underlying monolithic substrate is the presence of afilm forming agent such as a sol composed of silica, zirconia, zircon,titania, or mixtures thereof. Two commercially available sols for thispurpose are Nyacol Zr 10/20 and Nyacol Zircon. Silica sols suitable foruse as a washcoat component of this invention may be prepared by variousmethods known to the art. A silica sol suitable for application of awashcoat may be derived, for example, from a siloxane such as partiallyhydrolyzed tetraethylorthosilicate, Si(OC₂ H₅)₄ (TEOS), as described byS. Sakka, K. Kamiya, K. Makita, and Y. Yamamoto in the Journal ofNon-Crystalline Solids, 63, 223-235 (1984). In the particular methodtherein described, water, ethanol, and TEOS are combined in the molarratios of 8/4/1 with acid added as HNO₃ such that the acid concentrationis 0.01 M.

Whatever the precise manner of preparation of the silica sol, a washcoatslurry is provided by adding to the sol a silica-containing high surfacearea powder. In providing a substrate for a Pt catalyst, powderstypically suitable for use in the washcoat slurry have a particle sizeof between about 2 and about 20 microns, surface area of between about250 and about 1000 m² per gram, a micropore volume of between about 0.5and about 2 cc/g, and a micropore diameter of between about 25 and about500 angstroms. Illustrative of the powders which may be used in theinvention are those listed in Table II. Preferably, these powders areadded in amounts varying from 10 to 21% of the total washcoat slurryweight depending upon the physical properties of the powder. Routinescreening will determine the optimum amount of high surface area powderto add to the silica or zirconia sol.

In accordance with the method of the invention, application of thewashcoat slurry to the foraminal walls of the support is preferablyeffected by dipping the support in the slurry. An optimum slurryconcentration is that which affords maximum uptake of high surface areasilica per dip coating cycle, the cycle typically comprising dipping ofthe support in the slurry and release of the washcoat slurry from thehoneycomb channels as assisted by a gas stream passing through thechannels. To increase the loading, the dip coating cycle may be repeatedafter a brief drying period in air at room temperature. After the wetwashcoat has been built up to the desired level by repetitive dipcoating, the coated monolithic support is dried, conveniently at 100° to150° C. in a forced air oven, and the resultant green washcoat calcinedfor several hours at a temperature in the range of 500 to about 800° C.Washcoat uptakes of about 10 to 20 weight-% (after calcination) areobserved. Typically, after calcination, the washcoated foraminal wallsof the support have an area of between about 15 and about 50 m² per gramof monolithic catalyst.

As noted, the substrate for the active phase also includes a promotercomprising an oxide or silicate of zirconium, hafnium or titanium. Inaccordance with the instant method, the promoter is applied from a solas either a component of a washcoat slurry or in a separate

                  TABLE II                                                        ______________________________________                                                    Surface  Pore     Pore    Particle                                            Area,    Volume,  Diameter,.sup.a                                                                       Size,                                   Sample Code m.sup.2 /g                                                                             cc/g     angstroms                                                                             μm                                   ______________________________________                                        Syloid 74   350      1.1      126       4                                     Sylox 15    250      1.6      256     10-12                                   Grade 955.sup.b                                                                           300       1.65    220     12.64                                   (Ultrafines,                                                                  SMR 7-6759)                                                                   Grade 56.sup.c                                                                            300      1.2      160     <20                                     (Milled, 325                                                                  mesh, SMR 7-6759)                                                             Sylodent 700                                                                              700      0.6       34     <20                                     Grade 710.sup.d (SMR                                                                      480       0.75     63      4-20                                   22-213)                                                                       LZ-Y20 (H-ULY.sup.e)                                                                      600        0.48.sup.f                                                                              7.4  1-2                                     ______________________________________                                         .sup.a Pore diameter in Angstroms = [(40,000)(Pore Volume, cc/g)/(Surface     Area, m.sup.2 /g)].                                                           .sup.b Similar to Grade 952 with Grade 952 data reported here.                .sup.c Properties cited for 103micron (average particle size) powder.         .sup.d Davisil, Grade 710.                                                    .sup.e Designated as the hydrogen form of ultrastable Y zeolite, HULY.        .sup.f Reported void volume in cc/cc.                                    

step after the high surface area silica coating has been established atthe foraminal walls of the support. The role of the promoter is toconfer additional activity to the active phase and provide a means forimproved thermal stabilization of the active phase. Catalyticallyeffective amounts of the promoter oxide range from about 2 to 15weight-%, preferably 5 to 10 weight-%, of the washcoated monolithicsupport. A calcination is performed at a temperature of at least 550° C.on the washcoated honeycomb substrate after addition of the promoteroxide. Preferred promoter oxides of this invention include zirconia(Nyacol Zr 10/20) and zircon (Nyacol Zircon). In the foregoingdescriptions of washcoated monolithic supports, it is understood thatonce the promoter oxide is added, it becomes part of the washcoat so noseparate specification (i.e., promoter oxide-washcoat) will be given.

In order to make use of the improved performance monolithic catalysts ofthis invention, the active phase must be added in the appropriate formand amount and then activated for use through a proper procedure. Activephases containing either platinum or alkali-vanadium mixtures arewell-known for their effectiveness in catalyzing oxidation of sulfurdioxide in oxygen-containing gas streams. In accordance with theinvention, it has been found that deposition of such active phases onthe above described monolithic support and substrate produces monolithiccatalysts that exhibit excellent thermal and, in some cases, chemicalstability compared to known sulfuric acid catalysts, and also providethe reaction engineering advantages of monolithic catalysts.

In the catalytic oxidation of sulfur dioxide to sulfur trioxide, themonolithic catalysts of the invention exhibit significant advantagescompared to the particulate supported Pt catalysts known to the art. Forexample, the relatively small thickness of the high surface area silicacoating on the foraminal walls of the substrate, as compared to thediameter of a typical particulate catalyst, limits the depth ofpenetration of platinum into the bulk support to a depth much shallowerthan typically occurs in the case of particulate catalysts.Additionally, extruded particulate catalysts acquire a smooth outersurface as a result of the compression of the ceramic dough in the die.Consequently, the effectiveness of platinum (or other active catalystphases) that has penetrated beneath the support surface is decreased onthe particulate catalyst relative to the monolithic catalyst. The gasstream experiences much more mass and heat transfer resistance inreaching all of the available active phase catalytic sites on theparticulate catalyst. For the platinum monolithic catalysts of thisinvention, the platinum precursor salts are selected that permit theplatinum active phase to form with high dispersion uniformly distributedover the washcoat surface with stability at the same time toward thermalsintering. Air calcination and treatment of the adsorbed platinumprecursor species on the washcoated support with an oxidizable gas suchas SO₂ are effective to prepare the catalyst for use in the oxidation ofsulfur dioxide.

Two water soluble platinum precursor salts are found particularly usefulfor the preparation of the platinum monolithic catalysts of thisinvention, i.e., Pt(NH₃)₄ Cl₂ *H₂ O and H₃ Pt(SO₃)₂ OH. For the firstsalt, Pt(NH₃)₄ Cl₂ *H₂ O, a monolithic support having a high surfacearea silica at its foraminal wall surfaces is immersed in an aqueoussolution of the salt, then the pH is adjusted to 10 to 11 with aqueousammonia (NH₄ OH). Adjustment of the pH to above 10 is essential tofacilitate adsorption of the platinum(II) complex cation onto themonolithic washcoat surface. After the Pt(NH₃)₄ ²⁺ precursor complexcation is adsorbed onto the washcoat or other high surface area silicasurface, the monolithic catalyst is dried at (80°-120° C. and thenoptionally calcined in air at 350°-500° C. Thereafter the catalyst istreated with a gas stream containing an oxidizable gas such as SO₂ attemperatures from 300°-500° C. The use of H₃ Pt(SO₃)₂ OH as a platinumsource for catalytically active materials has been described in U.S.Pat. Nos. 3,992,331, 3,992,512, 4,044,193, and 4,082,699. Thisplatinum(II) salt is available as an aqueous solution. A Pt(IV) solobtained from a Pt(SO₃)₂ OH₃₋ precursor complex is generated through theaddition of excess hydrogen peroxide to an aqueous solution of H₃Pt(SO₃)₂ OH containing the proper concentration of platinum for loadingonto a monolithic substrate. In the absence of a hydroxyl-containinghigh area surface such as that found on the washcoated monolithicsubstrates of this invention, a colloidal precipitate of hydrous Pt(IV)oxide will form after several hours. However, if a washcoated monolithicsubstrate is immersed in the H₃ Pt(SO₃)₂ OH solution and hydrogenperoxide is added, then a hydrous Pt(IV) oxide deposits within tenminutes on the monolithic surface. Per the instant method, themonolithic catalyst is again dried and calcined after deposition of theplatinum active phase on the substrate. Calcination in air to 300° to500° C. is adequate to prepare the monolithic catalyst for use in theoxidation of sulfur dioxide.

Platinum loading on the monolithic catalyst is typically in the range ofbetween about 4 and about 100 g Pt per cubic foot. Preferably, thecatalyst contains between about 0.03% and about 0.5% by weight Pt, morepreferably between about 0.05% and about 0.15% by weight.

For effective use of the platinum active phase on a monolithic catalyst,it is essential that a promoter oxide or silicate be present on thesilica-containing washcoat or silica monolithic substrate. As notedabove, the preferred promoters for use with this invention are zirconiaderived from a zirconia sol and zircon derived from a colloidal mixtureof zirconia and silica.

It has been observed that the promoter is deposited from the sol in alattice configuration which provides cells within which discreteparticles of platinum catalyst appear to be deposited. This is indicatedby the electron microscopy data of FIGS. 1 through 5, wherein particlesof platinum shown in FIGS. 1, 2 and 4 appear as dark regions or spots,separated from each other by barriers (FIG. 2) that are comprised of thelattice structure of the promoter.

FIG. 1 is an overview transmission electron micrograph showing Ptdeposited on a ZrO₂ --SiO₂ washcoat powder removed from a finishedmonolithic catalyst. The platinum active phase appears as the darkregions in the micrograph. These regions average about 90 angstroms indiameter.

FIG. 2 is a high resolution micrograph of Pt supported on a ZrO₂ --SiO₂washcoat. Lattice fringes are exhibited by the ZrO₂ crystallites thatvary from 70 to 500 angstroms throughout the washcoat powder. The silicapresent in the washcoat remains amorphous.

FIG. 3 comprises an image analysis sequence for a ZrO₂ crystallite. Inthis sequence, FIG. 3(a) is a digitized image of one of the crystallitesshown in FIG. 2; FIG. 3(b) is a two-dimensional power spectrum of theimage of FIG. 3(a); FIG. 3(c) is a reconstructed digitized image fromthe power spectrum of FIG. 3(b); and FIG. 3(d) is a closeup of thereconstructed image in FIG. 3(c) showing the lattice spacings and anglesthat are unique to the cubic ZrO₂ structure.

FIG. 4 is a high resolution transmission electron microscopy imageshowing Pt deposited on a ZrO₂ --SiO₂ powder, showing identification ofplatinum in the dark region arrowed in the figure. The X-ray spectrumappears in the lower left inset and it identifies Pt as a primaryelement present in the vicinity of the arrowed region.

FIG. 5 comprises an image analysis sequence of various lattice fringessimilar to those shown in FIG. 3. Among these, FIG. 5(a) is a digitizedhigh resolution image of the lattice fringes area; FIG. 5(b) is atwo-dimensional power spectrum generated from the image in FIG. 5(a);and FIG. 5(c) is a reconstructed image from the two-dimensional powerspectrum in FIG. 5(b). Measured lattice spacings in the center regionare consistent with cubic ZrO₂ while the lattice spacings from the lowerright corner of the figure suggest the presence of either Pt metal orPtO₂. No evidence exists in any of these micrographs for a distinctphase formed between Pt and either ZrO₂ or SiO₂.

It is believed that the thermal stability of the monolithic catalysts ofthe invention may be accounted for in significant part by the effect ofthe lattice barriers illustrated in FIG. 2. Whatever the precisephysical geometry and mechanism, promoter compounds of zirconium,hafnium and titanium are effective to maintain the dispersion of thediscrete active phase particles, and to thereby prevent them fromsintering. Consequently, a high active surface area is preserved forcatalyzing the oxidation of sulfur dioxide to sulfur trioxide.

As noted above, it has been found that monolithic catalysts of theinvention which have a Pt active phase provide high rates of conversionof sulfur dioxide to sulfur trioxide while experiencing modest pressuredrop. More particularly, the activity of such catalysts under adiabaticconditions is such that the molar rate of conversion of sulfur dioxideto sulfur trioxide divided by the product of the mole fraction of sulfurdioxide and the square root of the mole fraction of oxygen in the gasphase flowing through the catalyst is at least about 12,000 moles of SO₂converted per hour per liter of catalyst.

In addition to platinum active phases with a promoter oxide for theoxidation of sulfur dioxide, it is also possible to preparealkali-vanadium-containing monolithic catalysts from the silicahoneycomb substrates described above and represented by the examples inTable I. Silica honeycomb composite materials represented by honeycombcodes LFC-1000 and LFD-1000 that contain 10 and 20%, respectively, of adiatomaceous earth are particularly suitable for preparation ofalkali-vanadium-containing monolithic catalysts of this invention.Although potassium makes up nearly all of the alkali content incommercially available particulate sulfuric acid catalysts, the use ofalkali ions other than potassium is possible. In particular,cesium-containing catalysts have been recognized for some time asoffering advantages in increased low temperature activity for the mixedalkali-vanadium active phase over catalysts containing nearly all alkalias potassium. Cesium containing catalysts are described in U.S. Pat.Nos. 1,941,426, 3,789,019, 3,987,153, 4,193,894, 4,431,573, 4,539,309,4,680,281, and 4,766,104, and in U.S.S.R. patents 1,202,610 and1,347,972.

The preferred alkali-vanadium catalysts of this invention consist of oneof the novel silica monolithic composite supports represented in Table Iwith an active phase that is applied to the silica monolith usingsolution impregnation of soluble salts of potassium, cesium, andvanadium followed by drying and calcination at 400° to 500° C. in anoxygen-containing atmosphere, preferably containing SO₃. Thesemonolithic materials may be used in a catalytically effective manner forthe oxidation of SO₂, particularly as low temperature "caps" upstreamfrom a conventional particulate catalyst bed. Low temperature "cap"operation has been described by H. Jensen-Holm and T. D. King("Oxidation of Sulphur Dioxide--New Catalyst Types," presented at theSulphur 88 conference in Vienna, Austria, Nov. 8, 1988, pages 75-84.)and H. Jensen-Holm and O. Rud-Bendixen ("Industrial Experience with theTopsoe VK58 Sulphuric Acid Catalyst and the WSA-2 process," Sulphur 1990preprints, The British Sulphur Corporation Ltd., 1990, pp. 291-310) fora cesium-containing particulate catalyst. The monolithic alkali-vanadiumand platinum catalysts described here are effective at gas velocitieshigher than those possible with particulate catalysts (i.e., >120 SLFM)and at low temperatures (380° to 410° C.). Monolithic catalyst usagewill depend upon the gas temperature, gas composition, and the flowrate. The monolithic catalysts described here are effective at high gasvelocities with significantly lower pressure drop per unit volumecompared to particulate catalysts.

The alkali-vanadium active phase under reaction conditions consists ofmolten mixture of sulfate salts dispersed evenly over the silicamonolith support. The alkali ions are selected from a group consistingof sodium, potassium, rubidium, and cesium, and most preferably,mixtures of potassium and cesium salts including all-potassium andall-cesium mixtures. Loading of the active phase onto the silica supportis accomplished by impregnation of a homogeneous solution of alkali andvanadium ions at any pH value that results in a soluble solution ofthese ions. The alkali/vanadium atomic ratio is adjusted in the range of2:1 to 6:1. preferably between about 2.7 and about 4.0:1, morepreferably 3.0 to 3.6. The optimum ratio is between about 3.3 and about3.6:1. The optimum loading of the alkali-vanadium active phase on thesilica monolithic support is adjusted in a range given by an α parameter(H. Livbjerg, K. F. Jensen, and J. Villadsen, Journal of Catalysis, 45,216-230 (1976)) defined here as follows:

    α=W.sub.V /(p.sub.V V.sub.p),

where,

W_(V) =(grams of vanadium calculated as V₂ O₅)/(gram of silica monolith)

p_(V) =(grams of V₂ O₅)/(cc of liquid molten salt)

V_(P) =pore volume of the silica monolith in cc/(gram of silicamonolith)

The article by Livbjerg, et al. notes that for alkali-vanadium moltensulfate salt mixtures, the value of PV is about 0.30 g-V₂ O₅ /cc liquidusing either uniform liquid film or dispersed plug models. An acceptablerange of α values for use with the catalysts of this invention includes0.10 to 0.40 but is preferably in the range from 0.10 to 0.30. For thesilica monolithic supports used here, an α value around 0.30 ispreferred.

Sources of vanadium useful in the preparation of an alkali vanadiumcatalyst include, for example, vanadyl sulfate, ammonium vanadate, andalkali metal vanadates. In preparation of the monolithic catalyst, thehigh porosity silica substrate at the foraminal wall surfaces of themonolithic support is impregnated with a solution containing such avanadium compound. Preferably, the solution also contains potassium orcesium ions, and anions selected from among sulfate, carbonate,hydroxide, nitrite and nitrate. The impregnated support is thereafterdried, thereby depositing an activable catalyst mixture in themicropores of the silica substrate. Activation of the dried, impregnatedalkali-vanadium salt mixture on the silica monolithic support isaccomplished through a thermal treatment in a range of about 400° toabout 600° C., preferably at about 500° C., in an O₂ -containingatmosphere preferably containing SO₃.

FIG. 6 illustrates a process for the oxidation of sulfur dioxide tosulfur trioxide in which the catalyst of the present invention mayadvantageously be used. A mixture of SO₂ and O₂ enters a contactconverter 11 comprising three preliminary catalyst beds 13, 15 and 17.Oxidation of SO₂ to SO₃ in catalyst bed 13 results in the generation ofa substantial amount of heat which is removed by passing the gas exitingstage 13 through an external heat exchanger 19, typically a waste heatboiler. Gas exiting exchanger 19 is returned to converter 11 and passedthrough catalyst bed 15 where further oxidation of SO₂ to SO₃ takesplace. Gas leaving bed 15 is removed from the converter, passed throughanother heat exchanger 21, and thence through an interpass absorptiontower 23 wherein the SO₃ contained in the gas is absorbed in sulfuricacid. Gas leaving interpass tower 23 contains unreacted SO₂ and O₂, andfurther oxidation of SO₂ to SO₃ is effected by returning the gas toconverter 11 and passing it through catalyst bed 17. Normally, the gasleaving tower 23 must be reheated to the optimum initial temperature forthird pass conversion before it is introduced into catalyst stage 17.

The pressure drop and catalytic efficiency of the monolithic catalystsof the invention are such that such catalysts may be used in each ofcatalyst beds 13, 15, and 17. Moreover, because of the favorablerelationship between conversion rates and pressure drop, use of thecatalyst of the invention in these beds allows the gas velocity throughstages 13, 15 and 17, to be substantially higher, and thus the diameterof converter 11 to be substantially smaller, than would be the case if aconventional particulate alkali vanadium catalyst were used in thesebeds.

Gas leaving heat exchanger 25 is passed to a conventional fourth stageconverter 27 containing a catalyst bed 29 comprising a particulatevanadium catalyst, preferably a Cs-V catalyst. In the fourth pass,residual SO₂ is converted to SO₃, after which the gas is passed throughanother heat exchanger 31, and thence through a final absorption tower33 where the SO₃ is absorbed in sulfuric acid.

Because a particulate catalyst is used, the catalyst bed of converter 27has a diameter substantially greater than that of catalyst beds 13, 15and 17, and the flow velocity through converter 27 is substantiallylower than the velocity through the beds of converter 11.

Gas leaving final absorption tower 33 is passed to the stack.

In accordance with the process of the invention, a sulfur dioxidecontaining gas, having an SO₂ content of between about 7% and about 13%,preferably about 8% to about 12%, is introduced into first preliminarymonolithic catalyst stage 13, and then passed in series through furtherpreliminary stages 15 and 17. Preferably, all three stages operate underadiabatic conditions. Because of the adiabatic operation, the gasleaving each preliminary stage is cooled, as described above, tomaintain a favorable thermodynamic equilibrium in the immediatelysucceeding stage.

The gas enters first stage 13 (at point A) at a temperature notsubstantially higher than that required for calculated temperature riseto the thermodynamic equilibrium. Preferably, the gas at point A isbetween about 420° C. and about 450° C. The converted gas stream exitingstage 13 at point B, containing sulfur dioxide, oxygen, and sulfurtrioxide, is passed through heat exchanger 19 and cooled to the desiredinlet temperature to the second stage, preferably about 460° C. to about500° C. (point C).

Further conversion of SO₂ to SO₃ occurs in the second stage, but therate of conversion in the second stage is significantly lower than inthe first stage due to depletion of SO₂ and inhibition by the increasingproportion of SO₃ that is contained in the gas stream. Consequently, thegas stream exiting the second stage at point D often may not reach thecalculated adiabatic equilibrium conversion of sulfur dioxide.

Gas leaving the second stage at point D then passes through economizer21, where the gas is cooled to a temperature above the dew point of thegas stream. Sulfur trioxide in the gas stream is then absorbed into asulfuric acid stream in the absorption zone of the interpass absorptiontower 23.

The interpass absorption tower 23 may be operated at a low acidtemperature to minimize corrosion to piping and heat exchangers.Alternatively, if desired, the interpass absorption may be operated athigh temperature under the conditions described in McAlister et al. U.S.Pat. Nos. 4,576,813 and 4,670,242 for recovery of the heat ofabsorption. In the processes of these patents, the acid enteringabsorption tower 23 has a temperature of at least about 120° C. and astrength of at least about 98.5%. Absorption acid discharged from tower23 has a temperature of at least about 140° C. and a strength of atleast about 99%. The discharge acid is cooled in a heat exchanger bytransfer of heat to another fluid, thereby heating the other fluid to atemperature of at least about 120° C., preferably greater than about140° C. Advantageously, steam may be generated in the heat exchanger ata pressure of, for example, about 55 psig or higher. By maintaining theacid strength throughout the cooler at ≧99%, various conventionaliron/chromium and iron/chromium/nickel alloys may be used forconstruction of the heat exchanger.

Gas exiting tower 23 is returned to converter 11 at point F at thedesired inlet temperature for the third pass, preferably between about450° C. and about 475° C. Further conversion of sulfur dioxide occurs instage 17 and the reaction approaches the thermodynamic equilibrium. Theconverted gas is cooled in heat exchanger 25 to a temperature which isabove its dew point, preferably about 360° C. to about 415° C. The gasstream exiting heat exchanger 25 (at point H) is introduced into thesecond reactor vessel 27 containing fourth stage particulate catalystbed 29. As in the case of the first pass, the preferred temperature ofthe gas entering the third and fourth passes is not substantially higherthan that required for adiabatic temperature rise to the calculatedthermodynamic equilibrium or near thereto.

The gas stream leaving the fourth pass (point I) is cooled in heatexchanger 31 to a conventional temperature for absorption (point J) andthen passes into a final absorption tower 33 where the SO₃ contained inthe gas is absorbed in sulfuric acid.

Under the conditions described above, the monolithic catalyst activityin the first three stages is high enough to afford high reaction ratesat high gas velocities, so that the thermodynamic equilibrium is reachedor closely approached in both the first and third stages. However, thegas temperatures are kept low enough that a favorable equilibrium ispreserved for the reversible reaction:

    SO.sub.2 +1/2O.sub.2 =SO.sub.3,

and maximum conversions are achieved.

Preferably, the monolithic catalyst contained in the second and thirdpreliminary catalyst stages (most preferably in all three preliminarystages) is of the type described above in which a promoter and aplatinum active phase are deposited over a high surface area silica atthe foraminal walls of a ceramic support such as mullite or extrudedsilica. A catalyst of this type has been found to exhibit both amoderate pressure drop per unit depth of catalyst in the direction offlow, generally less than about 12" water per lineal foot at a linearflow velocity of 600 standard ft./min., and a very high activity, sothat a high conversion is achieved per unit of catalyst volume andcontact time. The preferred monolithic catalysts contain between about100 and about 400 cells per in², have wall thicknesses of about 9.3 toabout 19.2 mils, and cell dimensions of between about 0.045" and about0.084". Preferably, the wall thickness is between about 13.3 and about14.4 mils and the cell dimensions between about 0.048" and about0.0543".

It has been determined that a catalyst of the above described type hasan activity index of at least about 12,000 moles SO₂ converted per hourper liter of catalyst as defined by the relationship: ##EQU1## whereX_(d) is the mole fraction of SO₂ contained in the gas stream fed to thecatalyst stage and X_(o) is the mole fraction of O₂ in the gas fed tothe catalyst stage. A high activity index allows the desired conversionto be achieved with relatively brief exposure of the gas to the catalystsurface, thus requiring a relatively small volume of catalyst.Generally, the total catalyst loading for the first three catalyststages need not be greater than about 15 liter days per short ton ofequivalent sulfuric acid, i.e., H₂ SO₄ equivalent to the SO₂ convertedto SO₃ in these stages. Even at a catalyst loading in the range of 5-10liter days per short ton of equivalent sulfuric acid, the high activityindex of the catalyst provides adequate conversion at a high volumetricgas flow rate through the monolithic catalyst bed. This factor, combinedwith the inherently favorable flow resistance characteristic of themonolithic catalyst bed, allows the monolithic catalyst stage to beoperated at substantially higher linear gas velocities than aconventional particulate catalyst bed for any given pressure dropthrough the contact stage. More particularly, it has been found possibleto operate the first catalyst stage at superficial gas velocities aboveabout 600 standard linear feet per minute (SLFM), preferably at leastabout 625 SLFM. Velocities achieved in the second and third stages arecomparable, though slightly lower than for the first stage, because ofconversion of O₂ and consequent reduction of the volumetric flow rate.For a given production capacity, because of the high velocities andrapid conversions achieved in the preliminary stages, converter 11(which conveniently houses all three stages) may have a diametersubstantially less than that of an otherwise comparable convertercontaining conventional particulate catalyst.

Where the SO₂ gas strength entering the first stage is in the range of10-11%, and all three preliminary stages contain a monolithic catalystof the type described above, conversions of 94-95% of the SO₂ enteringthe first stage may be achieved over these three stages. It has beenfound that, to achieve a total conversion of 99.7% of the gas enteringthe first preliminary catalyst stage, and/or to achieve an SO₂ emissionlevel of not greater than about 350 ppm in the tail gas exiting theprocess, a particulate vanadium catalyst containing cesium is requiredfor the final catalyst stage. A monolithic catalyst can provide asubstantial conversion in the fourth stage, but no known monolithiccatalyst can provide a 99.7% conversion in four stages at catalystloadings less than particulate catalysts, even with an interpass towerlocated between the second and third stages. By use of a particulateCs-V catalyst, fourth stage reaction can proceed to the thermodyamicequilibrium with a low inlet gas temperature in the aforesaid range of360° C. to 415° C. Thus, equilibrium is reached at a low temperature,which favors a higher conversion of SO₂ to SO₃.

Because a particulate catalyst is used, the final stage is operated atconventional gas velocities. As a consequence, the vessel housing thefourth stage catalyst bed is generally of a diameter comparable to thatof the final contact stage of a conventional sulfuric acid plant havingthe same productive capacity. However, despite the need to provide sucha vessel for the fourth stage, substantial capital savings may berealized by housing the preliminary stages in a vessel of significantlysmaller diameter than that required for comparable stages of theconventional process.

The particulate catalyst used in the fourth stage is an alkalimetal-vanadium catalyst, the alkali metal component of which ispreferably cesium. A suitable catalyst of this type is described inVilladsen U.S. Pat. No. 4,193,894. Preferably, the mole ratio of Cs to Vin the particulate catalyst is at least about 0.75. Catalyst loadingsfor the final stage are essentially the same as those used in aconventional contact acid plant.

For the desired ultimate conversion of 99.7%, it has been foundnecessary that interpass absorption be conducted between the second andthird stages (2:2) system. The process can be operated if the interpassabsorber is located between the third and fourth stages, but the highestoverall SO₂ conversion is achieved with a 2:2 rather than a 3:1 system.

In accordance with a further method of the invention for the manufactureof sulfur trioxide, sulfur dioxide is reacted with oxygen in converter11 as described above in connection with FIG. 6. If desired, the sulfurtrioxide may be absorbed in sulfuric acid as further depicted in FIG. 6.After a period of operation, the activity of the catalyst will typicallydecline, due to the combined effect of aging and exposure to thetemperature, erosion and corrosion conditions prevailing during the SO₂oxidation process. At that point, the catalyst may be temporarily takenout of service and treated with a mineral acid to produce a regeneratedcatalyst of renewed high activity. Because of the chemical stability ofthe catalyst of the invention, the catalyst may be subjected to vigoroustreatment which has the effect of restoring its activity, not causingdamage to it. Thereafter the regenerated catalyst may be placed back inservice and oxidation of sulfur dioxide to sulfur trioxide resumed.

The following examples illustrate the invention.

Test Reaction Methods For Examples

Comparative reactor evaluation methods graphically were used to quantifythe differences in performance between the monolithic catalysts of thisinvention and those existing in the prior art. Two of these methods areparticularly useful for comparative studies of the ability of variousmaterials to oxidize catalytically sulfur dioxide: (1) the thermalcatalyst aging tester (TCAT) reactor and (2) the activity testerreactor.

The TCAT reactor is designed to test different catalyst samples underidentical conditions for the oxidation of SO₂ at various inlettemperatures. Eight quartz dip-tube style reactor tubes are arranged ina circular fashion in a common electric furnace. All reactors operateunder closely isothermal conditions. A common feed gas supply is mixedand delivered at the same volumetric flow rate to each sample by meansof individual mass flow controllers. The inlet and outlet gas samplesare analyzed by a calibrated gas chromatographic procedure and the SO₂conversion of the inlet gas stream is determined. This analysis isrepeated for each catalyst sample at a given inlet temperature then theinlet temperature is increased by a specified amount to a new inlettemperature. Once a set of SO₂ conversions for these incremented inlettemperatures is completed for all samples in their fresh states, thetemperature is raised to 700°-750° C. for 24 hours. Thishigh-temperature treatment of all samples represents a simulatedaccelerated aging process which the catalyst experiences in a converterat reaction conditions over a prolonged period of time. The temperatureis then lowered to the lowest fresh inlet temperature and the SO₂conversions are again measured for all samples. The temperatures areagain incremented to give the same set of initial temperatures used forthe fresh sample cycle and the SO₂ conversions are again measured. Whenthis cycle is complete for all samples, the "aged" cycle SO₂ conversionsare compared to those in the fresh cycle. The most effectively thermallystabilized catalyst samples are those which show the least decline inSO₂ conversions between the fresh and aged cycles at various inlettemperatures.

The second comparative reactor evaluation method uses an activity testerreactor which measures differential conversions of sulfur dioxide when agas stream at a specified volumetric flow rate and gas composition ispassed over a catalyst sample. The inlet temperature is held at between475° to 482° C. by means of a molten lead bath that provides heating tothe inlet gas stream. Both the inlet and outlet temperatures aremeasured by appropriately placed thermocouples. A slip stream of theoutlet gas is passed through a sulfuric acid bubbler to remove the SO₃,then the gas stream is sampled and analyzed for SO₂, O₂, and N₂ using ahelium carrier gas and a thermal conductivity detector. A portion of theinlet gas stream bypasses the acid scrubber and is analyzed by gaschromatography for the initial SO₂, 02, and N₂ compositions. The SO₂conversions are calculated for pairs of inlet-outlet gas analyses. Thefinal SO₂ conversion for the sample represents an average of threemeasurements which has been corrected for the "blank" SO₂ conversionactivity of the reactor. The effects of various levels of active phaseloading can also be readily compared.

A third reactor system was used to evaluate the ability of themonolithic catalysts of this invention to operate under the heat andmass transfer conditions encountered in a full-sized sulfuric acidplant. Because commercial reactors for the oxidation of SO₂ operateunder closely adiabatic conditions, an integral reactor system in thelaboratory was used that would simulate a single bed of a sulfuric acidconverter. The reactor consists of a stainless steel tubular reactormounted inside a vacuum jacket to minimize heat losses. Between theoutside of the stainless steel reactor and the inside of the vacuumjacket, the reactor tube is wrapped with inert insulating materials suchas pieces of Fibrefrax ceramic blanket and glass tape. At variousintervals down the reactor, sample tubes are located that containthermocouples to measure the gas temperatures down the bed.Additionally, the sample tubes withdraw gas samples into a multiportrotary valve for gas chromatographic analysis. Gas is supplied to thereactor by means of mass flow controllers and may be preconverted tosimulate lower pass operation. A preheater section is used to adjust theSO₂ -containing gas stream to the desired inlet temperature to thereactor.

EXAMPLE 1

In order to identify initially classes of promoter materials for usewith the platinum-containing monolithic catalysts of this invention, aseries of silica particulate catalysts was prepared containing 2weight-% (calculated as the metal in the metal oxide) of the promoterand sufficient platinum to give 0.1% Pt in the final catalyst. ShellS980G 1.7-mm silica spheres were loaded by impregnation of a promoterprecursor species in aqueous solution followed by drying of theimpregnated species in a rotary evaporator at 90°-100° C. Theimpregnated silica spheres were calcined in air at 600° C. for severalhours. Platinum was deposited onto these silica spheres throughimmersion in an aqueous solution of H₃ Pt(SO₃)₂ OH containing enough Ptto give 0.1% in the final catalyst. The Pt active phase precursorspecies was absorbed onto the silica spheres through addition of excess30% H₂ O₂. After at least 10 minutes, the spheres were removed from thesolution, dried at 115° C., and calcined at 350° C. in air. Six sampleswere prepared by this general procedure with the promoter oxide and itssource given in parentheses as follows: 1 (No promoter oxide added), 2(Fe₂ O₃, Fe(NO₃)₃ *9H₂ O), 3 (Cr₂ O₃, Cr(NO₃)₃ *9H₂ O), 4 (CeO₂,Ce(NO₃)₃ *6H₂ O), 5, (Al₂ O₃, Nalco 1SJ-614, 10% colloidal alumina), and6 (ZrO₂, Nyacol Zr 10/20 zirconia sol). A seventh sample [designated 7(Pd(NH₃)₄ Cl₂ *H₂ O/NH₄ OH)] was prepared by a slightly differentprocedure in order to insure homogeneous deposition of the platinum andpalladium precursor salts. For sample 7, the silica spheres werecontacted with an aqueous solution of Pt(NH₃)₄ Cl₂ *H₂ O and Pd(NH₃)₄Cl₂ *H₂ O in sufficient quantity to give an equimolar loading of Pt andPd (i.e., Pt/Pd=1) and such that the final loading of the metals was0.1% Pt and 0.03% Pd. The tetraamine cations were adsorbed onto thesilica spheres by addition of ammonium hydroxide such that the pH was10.5. After one hour, the spheres were removed from the aqueoussolution, dried at 115° C. then heated sequentially in air with rampingto 350° C., purging in N₂, and cooling to 300° C. The sample was thentreated for one hour in 5% H₂ /N₂. This procedure provides a Pt-Pd alloysupported on silica along the lines of the claims in U.S. Pat. No.2,418,851.

All seven samples above (1-7) were loaded in identical 2.6 cc quantitiesinto quartz reactor tubes and evaluated using the TCAT proceduredescribed above. The results are summarized in Table III with the agedsamples denoted by an "A" following the sample number. Based on

                                      TABLE III                                   __________________________________________________________________________    Catalyst                                                                           1  1A 2  2A 3  3A 4  4A 5  5A 6  6A 7  7A                                __________________________________________________________________________    SO.sub.2 Conversion, %,                                                       of 9% SO.sub.2, 11% O.sub.2                                                   at Temperature, °C.                                                    350   9.0                                                                             0.6                                                                               8.0                                                                             13.5                                                                             1.9                                                                               4.7                                                                              3.9                                                                              7.7                                                                              8.0                                                                              8.7                                                                              7.2                                                                             15.5                                                                             38.7                                                                             3.1                               375  15.4                                                                             1.6                                                                              16.2                                                                             22.8                                                                             4.7                                                                               8.5                                                                              7.5                                                                             13.9                                                                             15.1                                                                             16.0                                                                             14.1                                                                             26.0                                                                             57.9                                                                             5.1                               400  22.8                                                                             2.8                                                                              31.6                                                                             34.5                                                                             9.9                                                                              13.0                                                                             13.7                                                                             21.1                                                                             24.1                                                                             25.4                                                                             23.4                                                                             37.7                                                                             73.3                                                                             8.6                               425  31.0                                                                             3.7                                                                              54.9                                                                             48.4                                                                             20.1                                                                             19.8                                                                             29.0                                                                             30.6                                                                             36.8                                                                             38.0                                                                             37.3                                                                             51.7                                                                             83.4                                                                             15.5                              450  35.7                                                                             4.8                                                                              73.6                                                                             63.3                                                                             32.5                                                                             31.6                                                                             52.4                                                                             43.4                                                                             51.9                                                                             53.4                                                                             55.4                                                                             65.5                                                                             88.4                                                                             23.4                              __________________________________________________________________________

comparison between the fresh and aged sample conversions from 350° to450° C., the following ranking could be established with respect to thebeneficial effect on thermal stability conferred by the promoter: 6(ZrO₂)>5 (Al₂ O₃) >2 (Fe₂ O₃)>3 (Cr₂ O₃)>4 (CeO₂)>>7 (Pd)>1 (None).

These results illustrate the promoter action of ZrO₂ on the platinumactive phase through the ability of the promoted Pt catalyst (6) toconvert SO₂ over a range of inlet temperatures. Thermal aging in flowingSO₂ /O₂ /N₂ at above 700° C. is seen to improve the SO₂ conversions ofsample 6 over the 350° to 450° C. temperature range examined.

EXAMPLE 2

Five mullite honeycomb substrates with 200 cells per square inch andoccupying from 9.98 to 10.89 cubic centimeters (cc) each were washcoatedwith a slurry prepared as follows. To 75.00 g of Nyacol Zr 10/20zirconia sol, was added 12.52 g of Grace Syloid 74 powdered silica(Table II). The mixture was shaken to produce a homogeneous slurry anddiluted with 30.00 g of water. To this slurry was added 0.28 g of Rohm &Haas Triton CF-54 and 0.14 g of BASF Pluronic L-61 surfactants. Themixture was shaken, poured into a 100-mL graduated cylinder, and placedon a magnetic stirrer. The slurry was agitated with a magnetic stir barwhile used for washcoating. The mullite honeycombs were dip coated twicewith the channels freed of excess slurry each time with a nitrogen gasjet. The samples were air dried at room temperature between each cycle.The samples were then dried at 115° C. and calcined in air at 600° C.for four hours. The washcoated mullite monoliths had an average uptakeof 9.6% of Syloid 74 SiO₂ --ZrO₂ (S74--ZrO₂).

Platinum loading of the above S74--ZrO₂ /mullite samples was through theuse of a H₃ Pt(SO₃)₂ OH stock solution containing sufficient Pt to giveloadings of 5, 10, 20, 30, and 45 g-Pt/ft³ based on an average volume of10.46 cc. Each monolithic sample was immersed in a separate solutioncontaining a total of 80 to 90 mL with the appropriate quantities of thePt stock solution. About 1 mL of 30% H₂ O₂ was added to each sample.After 3 hours, the samples were recovered, dried in a forced air oven at115° C., and calcined in air at 350° C. for four hours. The recoveredsamples contained 4.8, 10.1, 19.4, 31.7, and 45.8 g-Pt/ft³ based ontheir original volumes and 0.03 to 0.25% Pt based on their finalweights.

The five samples were evaluated in the activity tester reactor systemdescribed above using a 10% SO₂, 11% O₂ gas stream at 9.26 standardliters per minute (SLPM). The results are shown in Table IV in terms of% SO₂ conversion and recalculated as a space time yield in order tocompensate for sample volume variations. Comparison of the space timeyields (×10⁶) in Table IV shows that the sample having 19.4 g-Pt/ft³provides among the highest conversions (space time yields) with thelowest Pt loading. For honeycombs with 200 cells per square inch, a Ptloading of about 20 g-Pt/ft³ is taken as an optimum loading and is usedin many subsequent preparations.

EXAMPLE 3

On the basis of the promoter effect results presented in Example 1,variations were made in the honeycomb substrate, washcoat compositionand loading, Promoter, and platinum precursor salt in order to identifyPreferred Pt-containing monolithic catalysts with respect to thermalstability. Twenty-two samples shown in Table V

                  TABLE IV                                                        ______________________________________                                        9.6% (S74-ZrO.sub.2)/                                                         Mullite, 200 cells/                                                           inch.sup.2, Pt Loading,                                                       g-Pt/ft.sup.3                                                                              4.8     10.1    19.4  31.7  45.8                                 ______________________________________                                        Space Velocity, /hr.,                                                                      52300   53500   50600 55700 53500                                10% SO.sub.2, 11% O.sub.2                                                     SO.sub.2 Conversion, %                                                                     26.8    42.2    58.5  59.9  62.7                                 Space Time    1.27    1.96    2.87  2.67  2.91                                Yield.sup.a, × 10.sup.6                                                 ______________________________________                                         .sup.a Space Time Yield = (% SO.sub.2 Conversion/100)(Volumetric Flow         Rate, SO.sub.2)/(Space Velocity), where the Volumetric Flow Rate of           SO.sub.2 is 2.48 moles/hr., and Space Time Yield is given in units of         moles SO.sub.2 converted or moles SO.sub.3 produced.                     

                                      TABLE V                                     __________________________________________________________________________                       Honeycomb                                                                            Wash-                                                                             Pro-                                                                              Washcoat,                                                                           Pt  Acti-                                                                             Loading,                      No.                                                                              Catalyst Description                                                                          Substrate.sup.a                                                                      Coat.sup.b                                                                        moter.sup.c                                                                       Weight %.sup.d                                                                      Salt.sup.e                                                                        vation.sup.f                                                                      g-Pt/ft.sup.3                 __________________________________________________________________________     8 Pt(ZrO.sub.2)/SiO.sub.2                                                                       LBU-1000                                                                             None                                                                              1    7.60 PSA 1   20.3                           9 Pt(TiO.sub.2)/SiO.sub.2                                                                       LBU-1000                                                                             None                                                                              2    7.23 PSA 1   20.1                          10 Pt(TiO.sub.2 --SiO.sub.2)/SiO.sub.2                                                           LBU-1000                                                                             None                                                                              3    5.90 PSA 1   19.5                          11 Pt(S74-ZrO.sub.2)/Mullite                                                                     9494   1   None                                                                              15.51 PSA 1   20.1                          12 Pt(TiO.sub.2 --SiO.sub.2 -S74-ZrO.sub.2)/Mullite                                              9494   1   3   11.15 PSA 1   19.3                          13 Pt(S74-ZrO.sub.2 × 2)/Mullite                                                           9494   1.sup.g                                                                           None                                                                              15.89 PSA 1   18.5                          14 Pt(ZrO.sub.2 S74-SiO.sub.2)/Mullite                                                           9494   2   1   22.06 PSA 1   20.5                          15 Pt(S74-Zircon)/Mullite                                                                        9494   3   None                                                                               9.98 PSA 1   20.0                          16 Pt(S74-Zircon)/Mullite                                                                        9494   3   None                                                                               9.95 PTA 1   20.0                          17 Pt(ZrO.sub.2 -S74-SiO.sub.2)/Mullite                                                          9494   2   1   15.83 PSA 1   20.0                          18 Pt(Zircon-S74-SiO.sub.2)/Mullite                                                              9494   2   4   17.49 PSA 1   20.0                          19 Pt(ZrO.sub.2 -S74-SiO.sub.2)/Mullite                                                          9494   2   1   15.96 PTA 1   20.0                          20 Pt(Zircon-S74-SiO.sub.2)/Mullite                                                              9494   2   4   17.48 PTA 1   20.0                          21 Pt(ZrO.sub.2 -S74-SiO.sub.2)/Mullite                                                          9494   2   1   21.79 PSA 1   20.5                          22 Pt(G710-ZrO.sub.2)/Mullite                                                                    9494   4   None                                                                              10.93 PSA 1   20.0                          23 Pt(Al.sub.2 O.sub.3)/Cordierite                                                               9475   --  --  --    --  --  20.3                          24 Pt(H-ULY-SiO.sub.2)/Mullite                                                                   9494   5   None                                                                              20.36 PTA.sup.h                                                                         2   44.0                          25 Pt(ZrO.sub.2 -(S74-SiO.sub.2) × 2)/Mullite                                              9494   2.sup.g                                                                           1   14.45 PTA 1   20.2                          26 Pt(ZrO.sub.2 -(S74-SiO.sub.2) × 2)/Mullite                                              9494   2.sup.g                                                                           1   15.29 PTA 1   20.2                          27 Pt(H-ULY-SiO.sub.2)/Mullite                                                                   9494   5   None                                                                              20.36 PTA.sup.h                                                                         2   54.4                          28 Pt(ZrO.sub.2 --SiO.sub.2)/Mullite                                                             9494   6   1   18.10 PSA 2   39.6                          29 Pt(ZrO.sub.2 --SiO.sub.2)/Mullite                                                             9494   6   1   19.45 PTA 2   44.1                          __________________________________________________________________________     .sup.a Codes are as follows: LBU1000, silica substrate, 200                   cells/inch.sup.2 (cpsi); 9494, Corning Celcor, Mullite substrate with 200     cpsi; 9475, Corning Celcor, Cordierite substrate with 400 cpsi.               .sup.b Washcoat weight % compositions as follows: 1, 10.7% Syloid 74 (S74     + 63.8% Nyacol Zr 10/20 + 25.5% water; 2, 15.0% S74 + 85.0% silica sol        from Si(OC.sub.2 H.sub.5).sub.4, TEOS (27.0% water, 33.0% ethanol, 40.0%      TEOS, 0.01M HNO.sub.3); 3, 10.7% S74 + 63.8% Nyacol Zircon + 25.5% water;     4, 12.0% Davisil Grace 710 + 88.0% water; 5, 20.9% HULY + 79.1% silica so     from TEOS; 6, Nalco 2327 40% colloidal silica. Each sample was calcined a     600 ° C. in air after dip coating in the washcoat.                     .sup.c Promoters include: 1, Nyacol Zr 10/20; 2, 1:1 colloid of Nalco TX      2588 colloidal titania and water; 3, equal weights of promoter 2 colloid      and Nalco 2327 40% colloidal silica; 4, Nyacol Zircon, a mixture of           ZrO.sub.2 and silica colloids. The sample was calcined at 600° C.      in air after impregnation with the promoter solution.                         .sup.d Total % of the washcoat and promoter added to the honeycomb            substrate.                                                                    .sup.e Abbreviations: PSA = H.sub.3 Pt(SO.sub.3).sub.2 OH solution dilute     to the appropriate concentration and adsorbed onto the substrate through      addition of 30% H.sub.2 O.sub.2. PTA = Pt(NH.sub.3).sub.4 Cl.sub.2            *H.sub.2 O dissolved to the appropriate concentration in water and            adsorbed onto the substrate through addition of sufficient NH.sub.4 OH to     bring the pH to above 10.                                                     .sup.f Procedures used include: 1, calcination in air at 500° C.;      2, sequential oxidation in air followed by reduction in an                    H.sub.2containing gas stream as described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,582,650,         example 1.                                                                    .sup.g This catalyst was given two washcoats and is designated as such by     "× 2.                                                                   .sup.h This Pt salt was adsorbed onto the washcoated sample through ion       exchange with the ammonium form of HULY present in the washcoat.         

were prepared according to the following general procedure. Thehoneycomb substrate was selected as a 2.6 cc sample. The washcoat, ifany, was applied to this substrate by dip coating with one of the sixchoices given in Table V (footnote b). The washcoated substrate was thencalcined at 600° C. The promoter species, if any, was then added in aseparate impregnation step followed by calcination at 600° C. in air.The platinum precursor salt was then selected and deposited throughfacilitated adsorption onto the washcoated honeycomb substrate. Thefinal Pt loading is recorded in the last column of Table V.

Samples 8-20 were evaluated through a series of TCAT reactor runs withthe results for these 13 samples compiled in Table VI The aged cycle SO₂conversions are given in the first column to the right of the freshcycle and are denoted by an "A" following the sample number columnheading as was done in Example 1. Careful inspection of the data givesthe following ranking in terms of retained SO₂ conversion activity overthe 350° to 450° C. temperature range:14>19>17>11>13>20>18>16 >8>9>15>>12>10. In this sequence, the highestthermal stabilities were shown by samples 14, 19, and 17, all of whichcontained a "ZrO₂ --S74--SiO₂ " washcoat composition. The poorestthermal stabilities were shown by the two samples in which no form ofzirconium was added, namely samples 12 and 10. These samples exhibitunacceptable thermal stability and are not part of the preferredmonolithic catalysts of this invention. The remaining eleven samplesconstitute Preferred Pt-containing monolithic catalysts.

                                      TABLE VI                                    __________________________________________________________________________    Catalyst                                                                           8  8A 9  9A 10 10A                                                                              11 11A                                                                              12 12A                                                                              13 13A                                                                              14 14A                               __________________________________________________________________________    SO.sub.2 Conversion, %,                                                       of 9% SO.sub.2, 11% O.sub.2                                                   at Temperature, °C.                                                    350  19.2                                                                             11.4                                                                             29.1                                                                             11.5                                                                             20.8                                                                              5.8                                                                             18.8                                                                             17.3                                                                             18.3                                                                              9.7                                                                             25.1                                                                             18.8                                                                             31.7                                                                             47.4                              375  34.6                                                                             21.2                                                                             48.9                                                                             20.5                                                                             35.3                                                                             10.1                                                                             34.1                                                                             31.0                                                                             32.6                                                                             17.8                                                                             40.9                                                                             31.8                                                                             50.4                                                                             67.8                              400  53.5                                                                             33.2                                                                             68.0                                                                             31.5                                                                             52.8                                                                             14.5                                                                             51.7                                                                             48.1                                                                             50.6                                                                             27.4                                                                             57.6                                                                             46.8                                                                             67.9                                                                             80.6                              425  70.1                                                                             46.7                                                                             79.7                                                                             42.3                                                                             69.5                                                                             19.7                                                                             68.1                                                                             64.0                                                                             68.4                                                                             35.5                                                                             71.7                                                                             60.7                                                                             79.3                                                                             87.8                              450  79.2                                                                             60.1                                                                             84.0                                                                             52.5                                                                             79.2                                                                             29.0                                                                             76.5                                                                             74.3                                                                             78.8                                                                             44.2                                                                             80.2                                                                             70.6                                                                             84.9                                                                             90.3                              __________________________________________________________________________    Catalyst                                                                           15  15A                                                                              16  16A                                                                              17  17A                                                                              18  18A                                                                              19  19A                                                                              20  20A                               __________________________________________________________________________    SO.sub.2 Conversion, %,                                                       of 9% SO.sub.2, 11% O.sub.2                                                   at Temperature, °C.                                                    350  17.7                                                                               9.0                                                                              13.2                                                                             11.8                                                                             27.4                                                                              22.7                                                                             26.7                                                                              16.9                                                                             26.1                                                                              30.9                                                                             18.1                                                                              17.1                              375  30.0                                                                              17.3                                                                             23.9                                                                              22.3                                                                             44.4                                                                              37.7                                                                             42.8                                                                              29.0                                                                             42.6                                                                              48.4                                                                             31.1                                                                              30.5                              400  45.3                                                                              28.3                                                                             39.0                                                                              36.2                                                                             62.5                                                                              53.4                                                                             59.9                                                                              42.4                                                                             60.0                                                                              65.0                                                                             47.6                                                                              46.0                              425  62.4                                                                              40.9                                                                             59.0                                                                              52.0                                                                             75.7                                                                              67.4                                                                             74.6                                                                              56.9                                                                             74.2                                                                              77.8                                                                             63.8                                                                              62.6                              450  77.5                                                                              52.1                                                                             78.2                                                                              65.5                                                                             81.8                                                                              76.8                                                                             82.2                                                                              68.1                                                                             81.1                                                                              85.0                                                                             78.0                                                                              75.1                              __________________________________________________________________________

EXAMPLE 4

This example uses TCAT reactor data to compare thermal stabilization byzirconium and aluminum containing washcoats. Four samples numbered 21 to24 were prepared according to the Procedures summarized in Table V.Sample 21, Pt(ZrO₂ --S74-SiO₂)/Mullite, represents a preferredembodiment of this invention. Sample 22 uses Davisil Grade 710 silica incombination with Nyacol Zr 10/20 to produce a Pt(G710-ZrO₂)/Mullitesample. Sample 23 represents a cored out piece from a commercial sampleof 400 cells per square inch, Johnson Matthey 1000J/W12 CAB/18.00C/400/6, designated as Pt(Al₂ O₃)/Cordierite. Sample 24 was preparedusing variations of methods cited in Example 2 and Pt loading accordingto example 1 of U.S. Pat. No. 4,582,650. Sample 24 contains an acidstabilized form of aluminum in the H-ULY washcoat and represents apreferred embodiment of this invention. Samples 21 and 22 constitutezirconium-containing catalysts while samples 23 and 24 arealuminum-containing samples. The TCAT reactor data are summarized inTable VII. All four samples were run at the same time and the rankingaccording to retained activity in the aged cycle is 21>23>24>22. Allfour samples show acceptable retention of activity.

EXAMPLE 5

Thermal stability retention alone is insufficient to distinguish thepreferred Platinum monolithic catalysts of this invention fromcommercially available samples (sample 23 in Table V) representative ofthe prior art. Monolithic samples were therefore subjected to somechemical stability tests.

Two monolithic samples, 19 and 20 in Table V, were recovered from theTCAT reactor after a single accelerated thermal aging cycle shown inTable VI. These

                  TABLE VII                                                       ______________________________________                                        Catalyst                                                                              21     21A    22   22A  23   23A  24   24A                            ______________________________________                                        SO.sub.2 Conversion, %,                                                       of 9% SO.sub.2, 11% O.sub.2                                                   at Temperature, °C.                                                    350     26.4   46.6   20.4 12.4 29.3 31.8 34.6 15.8                           375     43.6   66.3   35.3 22.9 45.8 49.3 55.1 27.7                           400     61.6   79.8   51.3 36.8 60.2 65.8 73.5 42.7                           425     75.2   87.3   65.7 52.5 71.1 77.8 85.9 60.6                           450     83.2   90.2   74.7 65.1 76.9 83.9 91.9 75.3                           ______________________________________                                    

samples represent preferred embodiments of this invention. The sampleswere weighed then immersed in boiling water for 30 minutes. After dryingand calcination at 500° C. in air the samples were reweighed and theweights compared. Aged samples 19 and 20, denoted as 19A and 20A, werefound to lose only 0.22 and 0.28% of their original weight. This testshows the hydrolytic stability of the preferred samples of thisinvention.

A more severe test was then conducted on two pairs of samples: 25 and26, preferred samples of this invention denoted as Pt(ZrO₂-(S74-SiO₂)x2)/Mullite, and 23 and 23L, representative of the commercialPt(Al₂ O₃)/Cordierite samples. Samples 26 and 23L are essentiallyidentical to 25 and 23, respectively, except they were subjected to thefollowing acid leaching test. The samples were immersed in a stirredsolution of 30% H₂ SO₄ and heated to 95° C. for 24 hours. The sampleswere rinsed free of the acid solution, dried at 115° C., then calcinedat 500° C. for 4 hours. Initial and final weights were recorded forsamples 26 and 23L. The acid leached samples after calcination werefound to have weight losses of 0.98% for Pt(ZrO₂--(S74--SiO₂)x2)/Mullite, 26, and 59.52% for Pt(Al₂ O₃)/Cordierite, 23L.Duplicate samples of each gave closely similar values. Sample 23L wasseen to have lost most of its washcoat including the Pt active phase. Onthe other hand, sample 26 appeared essentially identical in appearanceto that of 25 as evidenced by its small weight loss.

Samples 19A, 20A, 25, 26, 23, and 23L were evaluated using the TCATreactor system. Differential conversion data over the temperature range350° to 450° C. are recorded in Table VIII. The aged cycles are

                                      TABLE VIII                                  __________________________________________________________________________    Catalyst                                                                           19A                                                                              19AA                                                                              20A                                                                              20AA                                                                              25 25A                                                                              26 26A                                                                              23 23A                                                                              23L                                                                              23LA                                  __________________________________________________________________________    SO.sub.2 Conversion, %,                                                       of 9% SO.sub.2, 11% O.sub.2                                                   at Temperature, °C.                                                    350  16.2                                                                             25.1                                                                              21.3                                                                             17.1                                                                              11.6                                                                             15.4                                                                             33.4                                                                             14.6                                                                             37.0                                                                             29.2                                                                              8.4                                                                             1.8                                   375  29.1                                                                             42.1                                                                              35.9                                                                             30.3                                                                              21.0                                                                             27.3                                                                             52.7                                                                             26.1                                                                             54.0                                                                             46.8                                                                             14.6                                                                             3.6                                   400  43.5                                                                             59.5                                                                              52.4                                                                             46.4                                                                              34.6                                                                             41.5                                                                             69.6                                                                             41.4                                                                             68.1                                                                             64.0                                                                             22.9                                                                             6.2                                   425  58.9                                                                             73.7                                                                              68.1                                                                             62.7                                                                              51.9                                                                             56.4                                                                             80.4                                                                             57.6                                                                             77.1                                                                             76.9                                                                             34.4                                                                             9.9                                   450  72.0                                                                             81.9                                                                              79.0                                                                             75.0                                                                              70.3                                                                             68.7                                                                             85.9                                                                             70.5                                                                             80.5                                                                             83.8                                                                             47.1                                                                             13.3                                  __________________________________________________________________________

represented by an "A" following the sample numbers, so in the case ofsamples 19A and 20A, the aged samples are labelled as 19AA and 20AA,respectively.

The comparison of the fresh and aged cycles in Table VIII permits thefollowing thermal stability ranking: 23>19A>20A>25=26>>23L. Note thatthe acid leached sample of this invention (26) is indistinguishable fromthat of the unleached sample (25) in thermal stability However, thecommercial Pt(Al₂ O₃)/Cordierite sample Example 4 but once exposed toaqueous acid, the (Al₂ O₃)/Cordierite formulation was severely damaged.Aqueous acid attack can occur in sulfuric acid plant converters duringshutdowns and upsets when moisture is allowed into the catalyst bedareas. Platinum cannot be considered well anchored on an aluminawashcoat due to the chemical instability of this washcoat in an acidenvironment.

The excellent acid leaching stability for sample 26 can be further usedto advantage in regenerative treatment to remove base metal particulatesthat accumulate on the monolithic catalyst over a period of time. Theacid leaching data combined with the TCAT reactor in Table VIII showthat preferred monolithic catalysts including the Pt active phase arestable toward acid attack. Nearly all metal oxides and sulfates of thefirst transition series and the main group will be dissolved under theconditions of treatment with 30% H₂ SO₄ at 95° C. for 24 hours. Thus,the preferred monolithic catalysts can be acid leached to removemetal-containing deposits with essentially no losses in either mass orSO₂ conversion activity.

EXAMPLE 6

In order to test the ability of various monolithic catalysts towithstand the thermal treatments experienced in a commercial sulfuricacid first pass converter, a set of four samples was loaded into a metalbasket and placed in larger sleeve containing a conventional particulatesulfuric acid catalyst that is available from Monsanto Enviro-Chem underthe trade designation LP-120. The sleeve was left in the first pass of ametallurgical sulfuric acid plant for one year. First pass differentialconversions were recorded on each of the samples before loading theminto the first pass sleeve. The conversions were measured again afterone year on each of the samples directly after recovery from the sleeve.No treatment of any kind was performed on these recovered samples. Theresults are summarized in Table IX for samples 27, 28, 29, and 23F.These samples are identified in Table V with respect to theircomposition and preparation. Sample 23F represents a cored out freshsample from 23 listed in Table V.

The results in Table IX show that only the Pt(H-ULY-SiO₂)/Mullite sample(27) retains a high level of its original activity. Samples 28 and 29were prepared from colloidal silica washcoats and promoted withcolloidal zirconia. Use of colloidal silica washcoats for preparation ofmonolithic catalysts is taught in U.S. Pat. No. 3,518,206. Samples 28and 29 along with 23F all show poor activity retention after one year offirst pass converter aging. The formulation of sample 27, as noted inExample 4, is one of the preferred embodiments of this invention.

                  TABLE IX                                                        ______________________________________                                        Catalyst     27      28        29    23F                                      ______________________________________                                        Space        50700   62200     66100 69500                                    Velocity, /hr.,                                                               8% SO.sub.2, 13% O.sub.2                                                      Inlet         480     480       480   481                                     Temperature, °C.                                                       SO.sub.2 Conversion,                                                                       67.07   58.05     53.13 56.49                                    %, Fresh                                                                      Space Time    2.62    1.85      1.59  1.61                                    Yield,.sup.a × 10.sup.6,                                                Fresh                                                                         SO.sub.2 Conversion,                                                                       62.58   19.71     20.75 15.13                                    %, Aged                                                                       Space Time    2.45    0.63      0.62  0.43                                    Yield,.sup.a × 10.sup.6,                                                Aged                                                                          ______________________________________                                         .sup.a Space Time Yield = (% SO.sub.2 Conversion/100)(Volumetric Flow         Rate, SO.sub.2)/(Space Velocity), where the Volumetric Flow Rate is 1.98      moles/hr., and the Space Time Yield is given in units of moles of SO.sub.     converted or moles of SO.sub.3 produced.                                 

EXAMPLE 7

Alkali-vanadium-containing silica composite monolithic catalystsrepresent preferred embodiments of this invention. The use of silicacomposite honeycomb substrates affords much more mechanical strengththan honeycomb substrates prepared from 100% of a porous silica powdersuch as diatomaceous earth. These silica composite monolithic catalystsare shown in this example to have excellent thermal stability towardhigh-temperature accelerated aging. Two 2.6 cc samples of the LFC-1000and LFD-1000 silica monolithic substrates given in Table I wereimpregnated with the sulfate salts of cesium and vanadium(IV), dried at90° C., and calcined in a 500° C. SO₃ -containing gas stream. Thesesamples have Cs/V =3.34 and α values of 0.30, with the α parameter usedas defined above. These samples were loaded into the TCAT reactor tubesas samples 31 (LFC-1000) and 32 (LFD-1000) along with a 2.6 cc sample of10 to 20 mesh of LP-120 catalyst having a K-V formulation, designatedsample 30. The TCAT reactor data are shown in Table X.

Over the temperature range of 360° to 420° C., the preferred monolithiccatalysts of this invention, samples 31 and 32, show essentially nodecline in SO₂ conversion activity upon thermal aging at above 700° C.for 24 hours. However, the particulate formulation shows a detectabledecline in activity and is much less active for the same volume ofcatalyst. In addition to thermal stability, this illustrates the lowtemperature promotional effect of cesium compared to that of potassiumin the commercial particulate catalyst.

                  TABLE X                                                         ______________________________________                                        Catalyst 30     30A      31   31A    32   32A                                 ______________________________________                                        SO.sub.2 Conversion, %,                                                       of 9% SO.sub.2, 11% O.sub.2                                                   at Temperature, °C.                                                    360       3.4    3.6      3.7  9.9    7.0 11.7                                370       5.1    5.6      5.1 14.7   10.9 17.2                                380       7.3    8.1     13.8 22.0   18.0 26.6                                390      10.8   12.1     25.1 32.9   28.5 40.7                                400      16.2   17.1     40.0 46.8   45.3 55.4                                410      26.5   23.3     58.7 59.6   58.7 64.8                                420      42.0   33.3     67.8 67.3   67.8 71.9                                ______________________________________                                    

EXAMPLE 8

The preferred alkali-vanadium monolithic catalysts of this invention canbe operated at gas flows higher than 120 standard linear feet per minute(SLFM). This example demonstrates the use of cesium as an active phasepromoter for increasing SO₂ conversions per unit volume of catalyst. Theamount of cesium added was varied according the inlet gas temperatureand SO₂ content of the gas stream.

A series of four alkali-vanadium monolithic catalysts was preparedaccording to the procedure described in example 7. Each catalyst has anLFC-1000 silica composite honeycomb substrate, (Cs+K)/V =3.34, and(α=0.30, but vary in the Cs-K content. The catalysts are designatedK₃.34 (33), Cs₀.75 -K₂.59 (34), Cs₁.50 -K₁.84 (35), and Cs₃.34 (36) withthe numbers in parentheses corresponding to the sample number.Differential conversions were measured at 125 SLFM for the fourCs-K-V-containing monolithic catalysts using both 10 and 8% SO₂ gasstreams. The results are given in Table XI for a constant inlettemperature of 480° C. The SO₂ conversion (also reported as space timeyields to factor out the effect of slightly variable sample volumes)shows a smooth variation between the all potassium-containing sample(33) and the all cesium-containing sample (36).

In a preferred embodiment of this invention, cesium is used as asubstitute for some or all of the potassium ions in the alkali-vanadiumactive phase of these silica composite monolithic catalysts. Thedifferential conversion results in Table XI show a marked improvement inSO₂ conversion activity as the cesium

                  TABLE XI                                                        ______________________________________                                        Catalyst     33      34        35    36                                       ______________________________________                                        Space        91700   92900     91700 93600                                    Velocity, /hr.,                                                               10% SO.sub.2, 11% O.sub.2 ;                                                   8% SO.sub.2, 13% O.sub.2                                                      Inlet         480    480       480   480                                      Temperature, °C.                                                       SO.sub.2 Conversion,                                                                       3.87    5.70      6.91  7.45                                     % of 10% SO.sub.2                                                             Space Time   1.95    2.84      3.49  3.69                                     Yield,.sup.a × 10.sup.6,                                                10% SO.sub.2                                                                  SO.sub.2 Conversion,                                                                       6.02    8.36      9.65  10.41                                    % 0f 8% SO.sub.2                                                              Space Time   2.45    3.36      3.92  4.14                                     Yield,.sup.b × 10.sup.6,                                                8% SO.sub.2                                                                   ______________________________________                                         .sup.a Space Time Yield = (% SO.sub.2 Conversion/100)(Volumetric Flow         Rate, SO.sub.2)/(Space Velocity), where the Volumetric Flow Rate is 4.63      moles/hr., and the Space Time Yield is given in units of moles of SO.sub.     converted or moles of SO.sub.3 produced.                                      .sup.b Space Time Yield same as defined in footnote except the Volumetric     Flow Rate is 3.71 moles/hr.                                              

content is increased. These results in addition to the mechanicalstrength possessed by the silica composite honeycomb substrates showclear improvements over the catalyst materials prepared by German patentDE 39 10 249.

EXAMPLE 9

A set of 12 silica composite monolithic catalysts with an average volumeof 34.57 cc and 2.40 cm in diameter were loaded into a tubular reactor.These samples were prepared with the same composition and procedure asthose for sample 36 in Example 8. The reactor was loaded into a vacuumjacketed vessel and sealed. Gas streams containing 8 and 10% SO₂ werepassed through the reactor at 125 SLFM. The gas temperatures weremonitored down the reactor in order to determine the point at which atemperature of 425° C. was obtained in this closely adiabatic reactor.Inlet temperatures were varied from 380° to 410° C. at 10° C. intervals.Based on the observed temperatures, the bed depth to the nearest inchwas determined in which a temperature rise to 425° C. would be observed.A summary of the bed depths is given in Table XII.

                  TABLE XII                                                       ______________________________________                                                          Bed Depth in Inches                                                           Required to Give                                            Inlet             425° C. for the                                      Temperature,      SO2 Gas Strength                                            °C.        8%     10%                                                  ______________________________________                                        380               33     27                                                   390               19     21                                                   400                8     12                                                   410                3      5                                                   ______________________________________                                    

At a temperature of 425° C., a conventional bed of K-V particulatesulfuric acid catalyst gives an adiabatic temperature rise to yieldessentially the theoretical equilibrium conversion of the SO₂ in the gasstream (75.5 and 67.5% conversions of 8 and 10% SO₂, respectively, gasstreams). Through the use of low temperature (380°-410° C.) caps ofcesium-containing alkali-vanadium monolithic catalyst upstream from aconventional particulate sulfuric acid catalyst bed, the overallconversion in the first pass can be increased with more heat generatedfor recovery.

EXAMPLE 10

Twelve monolithic catalyst samples each having an average diameter of2.38 cm and an average volume of 34.22 cm³ were loaded in series into atubular reactor with gas sampling tubes containing thermocouples aftereach sample. The samples comprised a mullite substrate and correspondedto catalyst No. 17, Table V, prepared according to the methods describedin Example 3 and possessed about 200 square cells of mullite substrateper square inch of cross-sectional area. A platinum active phase wasdispersed on washcoated the mullite substrate such that an average of20.18 grams of platinum per cubic foot (including solid and void volume)of monolithic substrate was present. Pieces of glass fiber were wrappedaround the monolithic catalyst samples in order to position the sampleswithin the tube and to minimize gas bypassing. The samples were used tosimulate the operation of the first three passes of the process shown inFIG. 6. A gas stream consisting initially of 10.0% SO₂ and 10.9% O₂ at avolumetric flow rate of 84.81 standard liters per minute (SLPM) waspassed over the monolithic samples at various inlet temperatures. Thecorresponding gas velocity of this gas stream is 624 standard linearfeet per minute (SLFM) to pass 1. After the sixth sample correspondingto 18 inches of catalyst, the conversion of the SO₂ in the gas streamwas measured and found to equal essentially the adiabatic equilibriumconversion value. The pressure drop across the entire 12 samples wasmeasured and scaled to 18 inches of catalyst depth. A similar procedurewas followed for passes 2 and 3 with the appropriate changes in gascomposition and flow rate. The results are summarized in Table XIII inthe entries to the passes 1 to 3 rows.

The fourth pass particulate catalyst was a commercially availablecesium-containing product manufactured by Monsanto Enviro-Chem Systems,Inc., known as Cs-110. The Cs-110 catalyst is in the form of 3/8-inchdiameter rings averaging 1/2-inch in length. A 4.219-inch insidediameter tubular reactor was filled with a total of 915.0 cm³ of Cs-110catalyst. The volumetric flow rate to the reactor was scaled to 131.70SLPM with 10.0% SO₂ fed to pass 1 so that catalyst loadings for the 40-and 44-inch sampling points corresponded to 100 and 110 L/ST,respectively. In this 2:2 interpass absorption process, thecorresponding flow to pass 3 will be 115.90 SLPM after SO₃ absorption inthe interpass absorption tower 23 in FIG. 1 25 and O₂ consumption. Thegas composition of the 115.90 SLPM gas stream to pass 3 is 2.27% SO₂ and7.85% O₂. This gas stream was preconverted to 76.3% of the 2.27% SO₂before being fed to the reactor containing the pass 4 Cs-110 catalyst.With an inlet temperature of 410° C., the %SO₂ conversion of the 2.27%SO₂, 7.85% O₂ gas stream reached 98.3 and 98.7% at the 40- and 44-inchreactor points, respectively, as determined by gas chromatographicanalysis. The estimated catalyst loading required to give 98.5%conversion (corresponding to 99.7% overall SO₂ conversion) is 105.00L/ST. The results are given in Table XIII in the row for pass 4.

                                      TABLE XIII                                  __________________________________________________________________________    Catalyst   Gas Inlet                                                                              % SO.sub.2 Conversion                                                                       Estimated Pressure Drop,.sup.d              Pass.sup.a                                                                       Loading, L/ST.sup.b                                                                   Temperature, °C.                                                                In  Out                                                                              Equilibrium.sup.c                                                                    Inches Water Column                         __________________________________________________________________________    1  3.48    445       0.0                                                                              65.1                                                                             65.2   16.1                                        2  3.48    500      64.9                                                                              80.4                                                                             84.5   12.8                                        Interpass Absorption After Pass 2                                             3  3.48    460       0.0                                                                              80.8.sup.e                                                                       90.8   11.0                                        4  105.00  410      76.3                                                                              98.5                                                                             98.7   27.6                                                            Total.sup.f                                                                       99.7                                                                             99.7                                               __________________________________________________________________________     .sup.a Integral reactor data for a 2:2 interpass absorption sulfuric acid     production process with a 10% SO.sub.2 and 10/9% O.sub.2 gas stream fed t     pass 1. Data are based on the use of Pt(ZrO.sub.2 --SiO.sub.2)/mullite        monolithic catalyst in passes through 3 and a commercial cesiumcontaining     particulate catalyst in pass 4.                                               .sup.b Abbreviations: L = liters of catalyst, ST = short tons of 100%         H.sub.2 SO.sub.4.                                                             .sup.c Pressure drop measured across a full integral bed of catalyst and      recalculated for the bed depth at which the catalyst loading was              determined for passes 1-3. For pass 4, the particulate catalyst pressure      drop was calculated by using the appropriate expression for inch ring         catalyst and includes contributions from the catalyst support grid in the     reactor.                                                                      .sup.e Conversions reported in passes 3 and 4 are calculated from the         amount of SO.sub.2 that remains in the gas stream after interpass             absorption after pass 2 assuming 80.0% overall SO.sub.2 conversion throug     pass 2.                                                                       .sup.f Total conversions in this row are based on the initial 10.0%           SO.sub.2 level.                                                          

EXAMPLE 11

The same catalysts used in Example 10 were used here except that the gascomposition to pass 1 was changed to 11.0% SO₂ and 9.9% O₂. For pass 1with an inlet temperature of 430° C., the SO₂ conversions measured atthe 15and 18-inch reactor points were 63.2 and 65.1%, respectively,giving an estimated conversion of 63.7% conversion in 16 inches ofcatalyst. The results are summarized in the pass 1 row of Table XIV.Pass 2 data only assumes that pass 1 reaches 61.8% SO₂ conversion andobtains a total conversion of 75.3% in 18 inches of monolithic catalyst.After interpass absorption, assuming that 75.0% overall SO₂ conversionis obtained through pass 2, pass 3 shows that 79.6% conversion isobtained of a 3.11% SO₂, 6.57% O₂ gas stream with a flow rate of 74.31SLPM.

For the pass 4 Cs-110 particulate catalyst, a gas flow rate to the firstpass of 53.93 SLPM was assumed. This gas stream is reduced to 47.20 SLPMafter SO₃ absorption and O₂ consumption after pass 2. Beforeintroduction to the simulated fourth pass, the 47.20 SLPM gas stream waspreconverted to 78.7% of the 3.14% SO₂ (and 6.59% O₂) composition. Thereactor inlet temperature for the fourth pass was 389° C. and the gasstream at this point contained 0.69% SO₂ which was converted to 98.8% ofthe third pass 3.14% SO₂ composition (overall SO₂ conversion reached99.7%) in 44 inches of catalyst corresponding to a required catalystloading of 244.44 L/ST.

                                      TABLE XIV                                   __________________________________________________________________________    Catalyst   Gas Inlet                                                                              % SO.sub.2 Conversion                                                                       Estimated Pressure Drop,.sup.d              Pass.sup.a                                                                       Loading, L/ST.sup.b                                                                   Temperature, °C.                                                                In  Out                                                                              Equilibrium.sup.c                                                                    Inches Water Column                         __________________________________________________________________________    1  2.82    430       0.0                                                                              63.7                                                                             63.7   13.4                                        2  3.17    475      61.8                                                                              75.3                                                                             84.9   11.6                                        Interpass Absorption After Pass 2                                             3  3.17    460       0.0                                                                              79.6.sup.e                                                                       86.3   11.4                                        4  244.44  389      78.7                                                                              98.8                                                                             99.0   64.8                                                            Total.sup.f                                                                       99.7                                                                             99.7                                               __________________________________________________________________________     Integral reactor data for 2:2 interpass absorption sulfuric acid              production process with an 11% SO.sub.2 and 9.9% O.sub.2 gas stream fed t     pass 1. Data are based on the use of Pt(ZrO.sub.2 --SiO.sub.2)/mullite        monolithic catalyst in passes 1 through 3 and a commercial                    cesiumcontaining particulate catalyst in pass 4.                              .sup.b Abbreviations: L = liters of catalyst, ST = short tons of 100%         H.sub.2 SO.sub.4.                                                             .sup.c Calculated adiabatic equilibrium conversion of SO.sub.2.               .sup.d Pressure drop observed across a full integral bed of catalyst and      recalculated for the bed depth loading was determined for passes 1-3. For     pass 4, the particulate catalyst pressure drop was estimated from the         appropriate equation for 3/8" ring catalyst. Pressure drop for passes 1-3     is for catalyst only while the value given for pass 4 includes the            catalyst support grid in addition to the catalyst.                            .sup.e Conversions reported in passes 3 and 4 are calculated from the         amount of SO.sub.2 that remains in the gas stream after interpass             absorption after pass 2 assuming 75.0% overall SO.sub.2 conversion throug     pass 2.                                                                       .sup.f Total conversions in this row are based on the initial 11.0%           SO.sub.2 level.                                                          

EXAMPLE 12

Monolithic catalysts may be used advantageously in this process whentheir catalytic efficiency as gauged by the activity index exceeds12,000 moles of SO₂ converted per liter of catalyst per hour. In thisexample, the same monolithic catalysts described in Example 10 were feda 10.0% SO₂, 10.9% O₂ gas stream at a higher gas velocity (833 SLFM)under second pass conditions. With preconversions of the 10% SO₂ gasstream around 65%, the results summarized in Table XV were obtained.Activity indices are given in footnotes for the 18- and 36-inch samplingpoints of the monolithic catalyst. As seen from these values, at nopoint does the activity index exceed a value of 12,000. Thus, a lowergas velocity such as that used in examples 1 and 2 is required to givehigher conversions across the catalyst bed.

                                      TABLE XV                                    __________________________________________________________________________    Run Code, Inlet, °C..sup.a                                             Flow (SPLM), % SO.sub.2, % O.sub.2.sup.b                                                     Monolithic Catalyst Bed Depth, Inches                          % SO.sub.2, % O.sub.2, DP(DP/foot)                                                           0  6  12 15 18  21 24 27 36                                    __________________________________________________________________________                   % SO.sub.2 Conversion.sup.d                                    MC11, 461      65.24                                                                            69.12                                                                            71.81                                                                            73.86                                                                            74.82.sup.e                                                                       76.01                                                                            77.72                                                                            78.31                                                                            82.25.sup.f                           84.81, 10.00, 10.90                                                           3.85, 8.12, 25.25(8.42)                                                       MA12, 476      64.55                                                                            70.20                                                                            74.11                                                                            76.21                                                                            77.17.sup.g                                                                       78.50                                                                            80.29                                                                            81.32                                                                            83.21.sup.h                           84.81, 9.99, 10.91                                                            3.92, 8.09, 26.75(8.92)                                                       MA13, 500      65.12                                                                            71.73                                                                            76.05                                                                            78.10                                                                            79.12.sup.i                                                                       80.21                                                                            81.50                                                                            82.51                                                                            84.40.sup.j                           84.81, 10.00, 10.90                                                           3.87, 8.07, 27.50(9.17)                                                       __________________________________________________________________________     .sup.a Example number followed by the temperature at the inlet to pass 2.     .sup.b Flow rate to first pass with the compositions of SO.sub.2 and          O.sub.2 following.                                                            .sup.c Pass 2 inlet gas analysis for % SO.sub.2 and % O.sub.2 (with the       SO.sub.2 removed) and the pressure drop across the 0 and 36inch bed           depths. In parentheses is the pressure drop in inches water column per        foot of catalyst.                                                             .sup.d Conversion of SO.sub.2 fed to the second pass calculated on the        basis of the preconverted value shown at the 0inch bed depth.                 .sup.e Activity index = 8173 moles SO.sub.2 converted/liter of                catalysthour.                                                                 .sup.f Activity index = 7312 moles SO.sub.2 converted/liter of                catalysthour.                                                                 .sup.g Activity index = 10740 moles SO.sub.2 converted/liter of               catalysthour.                                                                 .sup.h Activity index = 9861 moles SO.sub.2 converted/liter of                catalysthour.                                                                 .sup.i Activity index = 11941 moles SO.sub.2 converted/liter of               catalysthour.                                                                 .sup.j Activity index = 11422 moles SO.sub.2 converted/liter of               catalysthour.                                                            

EXAMPLE 13

High catalytic efficiencies are difficult to achieve with monolithiccatalysts in the final pass of a catalytic SO₂ conversion unit. Thisexample shows that neither overall SO₂ conversions of at least 99.7% noractivity indices above 12,000 moles of SO₂ converted per liter ofcatalyst per hour are achieved with monolithic catalysts under fourthpass conditions (10.0% SO₂ fed to the first pass) in a 2:2 IPA process.

Twelve monolithic catalysts closely similar to those described inExample 10 were evaluated under fourth pass conditions. Reactor inlettemperatures of 430 to 500° C. were used with gas sampling and analysisat various intervals down a 36-inch deep bed of monolithic catalyst. Theresults summarized in Table XVI were obtained. Overall SO₂ conversionsthrough 36 inches of catalyst reach between 98 and 99%. Activity indicescalculated through 18 inches of catalyst are less than 12,000 moles ofSO₂ converted per liter of catalyst per hour. Consequently,alkalivandium-containing particulate catalysts such as Cs-110 describedin Example 10 are favored for use in pass 4.

In view of the above, it will be seen that the several objects of theinvention are achieved and other advantageous results attained.

As various changes could be made in the above methods and productswithout departing from the scope of the invention, it is intended thatall matter contained in the above description shall be interpreted asillustrative and not in a limiting sense.

                                      TABLE XVI                                   __________________________________________________________________________    Run Code, Inlet, °C..sup.a                                             Flow (SPLM, SLFM).sup.c                                                       (% SO.sub.2, % O.sub.2, % N.sub.2, % SO.sub.3, DP).sup.d                                        Monolithic Catalyst Bed Depth, Inches                       (% SO.sub.2, % O.sub.2).sup.e                                                                   0   3  6  9  12 15 18  21 36                                __________________________________________________________________________                      % SO.sub.2 Conversion.sup.d                                                   (Total % SO.sub.2 Conversion.sup.g)                         MA23, 430         77.95                                                                             79.10                                                                            81.24                                                                            82.51                                                                            83.42                                                                            84.31                                                                            86.41                                                                             85.82                                                                            90.50                             72.35, 547        (96.24.sup.                                                                       96.44                                                                            96.81                                                                            97.02                                                                            97.18                                                                            97.33                                                                            97.69                                                                             97.59                                                                            .sup. 98.39)                      (0.50, 7.11, 90.61, 1.78, 13.7)      6929.sup.h                               (2.25, 7.93)                                                                  MA25, 445         71.03                                                                             74.87                                                                            77.73                                                                            80.77                                                                            81.88                                                                            84.29                                                                            83.29                                                                             85.24                                                                            90.19                             72.40, 548        (94.95.sup.                                                                       95.62                                                                            96.12                                                                            96.65                                                                            96.84                                                                            97.26                                                                            97.09                                                                             97.43                                                                            .sup. 98.29)                      (0.66, 7.19, 90.54, 1.62, 14.3)      10004                                    (2.26, 7.94)                                                                  MA26, 460         76.77                                                                             79.91                                                                            82.80                                                                            84.96                                                                            86.51                                                                            87.41                                                                            88.42                                                                             88.26                                                                            92.01                             72.35, 547        (96.04.sup.                                                                       96.58                                                                            97.07                                                                            97.44                                                                            97.07                                                                            97.86                                                                            98.03                                                                             98.00                                                                            .sup. 98.64)                      (0.53, 6.91, 90.79, 1.77, 14.3)      9535                                     (2.26, 7.94)                                                                  MA27, 475         78.62                                                                             81.94                                                                            84.09                                                                            86.67                                                                            87.87                                                                            89.18                                                                            89.98                                                                             89.99                                                                            93.51                             72.33, 547        (96.39.sup.                                                                       96.95                                                                            97.32                                                                            97.75                                                                            97.95                                                                            98.17                                                                            98.31                                                                             98.31                                                                            .sup. 98.91)                      (0.49, 6.87, 90.82, 1.82, 15.1)      9306                                     (2.27, 7.71)                                                                  MA28, 500         78.34                                                                             80.84                                                                            82.84                                                                            84.21                                                                            85.73                                                                            87.30                                                                            88.31                                                                             88.82                                                                            91.65                             72.34, 547        (96.33.sup.                                                                       96.75                                                                            97.09                                                                            97.32                                                                            97.58                                                                            97.85                                                                            98.02                                                                             98.11                                                                            .sup. 98.58)                      (0.50, 6.87, 90.81, 1.81, 15.4)      8167                                     (2.29, 7.71)                                                                  __________________________________________________________________________     .sup.a Run code followed by the inlet temperature to the reactor.             .sup.b Flow rate to first pass is 82.63 SLPM (8.26 SLPM SO.sub.2, 9.09        SLPM O.sub.2, 65.28 SLPM N.sub.2, fed as 43,28 SLPM air and 31.09 SLPM        N.sub.2) with 10.00% SO.sub.2 and 10.90% O.sub.2. Total flows were            adjusted for values around 83% SO.sub.2 conversion through the second         pass.                                                                         .sup.c Total gas flow rate (SLPM) and velocity (SLFM) to reactor after        O.sub.2 consumption across the preconverter and SO.sub.2 and N.sub.2          addition at the preheater to the reactor.                                     .sup.d Feed gas analysis for SO.sub.2, O.sub.2, N.sub.2, SO.sub.3 (based      on SO.sub.2 conversion), and measured pressure drop in W.C. across the 36     catalyst bed depth.                                                           .sup.e Compositions of SO.sub.2 and O.sub.2 in % to pass 3 after interpas     SO.sub.3 absorption.                                                          .sup.f Conversion of SO.sub.2 based on the amount fed to the first pass.      .sup.g Total conversion of SO.sub.2 based on the amount fed to the first      pass.                                                                         .sup.h Activity index value given here and at corresponding succeeding        points in the table.                                                     

What is claimed is:
 1. A monolithic catalyst for the conversion ofsulfur dioxide to sulfur trioxide comprising a foraminous monolithicceramic support, said support having at the foraminal wall surfacesthereof a high surface area acid resistant substrate for an activecatalyst phase, and a combination of a platinum active phase and apromoter on said substrate, said promoter being selected from the groupconsisting of a compound of zirconium, a compound of titanium or acompound of hafnium.
 2. A monolithic catalyst for the conversion ofsulfur dioxide to sulfur trioxide comprising a foraminous monolithicceramic support, said support having at the foraminal wall surfacesthereof a high surface area substrate for an active catalyst phase, anda platinum active phase on said substrate, said substrate comprisinghigh surface area silica and a promoter selected from the groupconsisting of a compound of zirconium, a compound of titanium or acompound of hafnium.
 3. A monolithic catalyst as set forth in claim 2wherein said support is comprised of a material selected from the groupconsisting of mullite and silica
 4. A monolithic catalyst as set forthin claim 3 wherein the material of said support is mullite and saidsubstrate comprises a silica washcoat applied over said support.
 5. Amonolithic catalyst as set forth in claim 4 wherein said promoter isselected from the group consisting of zirconia and zircon.
 6. Amonolithic catalyst as set forth in claim 4 wherein said washcoatcomprises high surface area silica bound to said support by a sol thatis dried and calcined.
 7. A monolithic catalyst as set forth in claim 7wherein said sol comprises a silica sol.
 8. A monolithic catalyst as setforth in claim 7 wherein said promoter comprises a metal oxide depositedfrom a sol of said oxide on the surface of said washcoat.
 9. Amonolithic catalyst as set forth in claim 6 wherein said promotercomprises a metal oxide and said sol comprises a sol of said metaloxide.
 10. A monolithic catalyst as set forth in claim 6 wherein saidpromoter comprises a metal oxide and said sol comprises a mixed sol ofsaid metal oxide and silica.
 11. A monolithic catalyst as set forth inclaim 4 comprising between about 2% and about 15% by weight saidpromoter based on the total weight of the monolithic catalyst.
 12. Amonolithic catalyst as set forth in claim 11 containing between about 5%and about 10% by weight of said promoter.
 13. A monolithic catalyst asset forth in claim 4 comprising discrete particles of said platinumactive phase dispersed on said washcoat, and a promoter phase comprisinga zirconia, zircon, titania or hafnia lattice that is effective tomaintain the dispersion of said discrete active phase particles.
 14. Amonolithic catalyst as set forth in claim 13 wherein said promoter phasecomprises zirconia or zircon.
 15. A monolithic catalyst as set forth inclaim 4 wherein the area of the washcoated surface of said support isbetween about 15 and about 50 m² /g.
 16. A monolithic catalyst as setforth in claim 4 wherein said high surface area silica comprisesmicroporous silica having a particle size between about 2 and about 20microns, a surface area of between about 250 and about 1000 m² per gram,a micropore volume of between about 0.5 and about 2 cc/g, and amicropore diameter of between about 25 and about 500 angstroms.
 17. Amonolithic catalyst as set forth in claim 4 containing between about 4and about 100 g Pt per cubic foot.
 18. A monolithic catalyst as setforth in claim 17 comprising between about 0.03% and about 0.5% byweight platinum.
 19. A monolithic catalyst as set forth in claim 18comprising between about 0.05 and about 0.15% by weight platinum.
 20. Amonolithic catalyst as set forth in claim 17 having a flow resistancecharacteristic such that the pressure drop of a gas containing sulfurdioxide, oxygen and nitrogen flowing at a velocity of 600 standard feetper minute is not greater than about 8" water per lineal foot in thedirection of flow.
 21. A monolithic catalyst as set forth in claim 20wherein said foraminous support comprises between about 100 and about400 pores per square inch of a cross section taken transverse to thedirection of gas flow through the catalyst.
 22. A monolithic catalyst asset forth in claim 21 wherein the foraminous void fraction is betweenabout 0.25 and about 0.75.
 23. A monolithic catalyst as set forth inclaim 20 having an activity under adiabatic conditions such that, in thegas phase reaction of sulfur dioxide with oxygen to form sulfurtrioxide, the molar rate of conversion of sulfur dioxide to sulfurtrioxide divided by the product of the mole fraction of sulfur dioxideand the square root of the mole fraction of oxygen in the gas phaseflowing through the catalyst is at least about 12,000 moles of SO₂converted per hour per liter of catalyst.
 24. A monolithic catalyst asset forth in claim 4 wherein the platinum active phase is deposited onsaid substrate from a solution of a precursor complex selected from thegroup consisting of Pt(NH₃)₄ ⁺⁺ and Pt(SO₃)₂ OH³⁻.
 25. A monolithiccatalyst as set forth in claim 24 wherein said precursor complexcomprises Pt(NH₃)₄ ⁺⁺ and is deposited from an aqueous solution ofammonium hydroxide at a pH of at least about
 10. 26. A monolithiccatalyst as set forth in claim 24 wherein said precursor complexcomprises Pt(SO₃)₂ OH³ and is deposited from a solution containinghydrogen peroxide and having a pH of between about 1 and about
 2. 27. Amonolithic catalyst as set forth in claim 24 wherein said promoter isselected from the group consisting of zirconia and zircon.
 28. Amonolithic catalyst as set forth in claim 2 wherein said supportcomprises a foraminous silica composite produced by co-extrusion of ahigh porosity and a low porosity silica, said substrate comprising highporosity silica at the foraminal wall surfaces of said foraminoussupport.
 29. A monolithic catalyst as set forth in claim 28 wherein saidhigh porosity silica comprises a low density silica having a particlesize no greater than about 20 microns, and said low porosity silica hasa particle size between about 20 and about 74 microns.
 30. A monolithiccatalyst as set forth in claim 29 wherein said high porosity silica atthe foraminal wall surfaces of said support has a surface area ofbetween about 2 and 400 m^(2/) g.
 31. A monolithic catalyst as set forthin claim 30 wherein said high porosity silica has a surface area ofbetween about 100 and about 400 m^(2/) g and a pore volume of betweenabout 0.5 and about 2 cc/g.
 32. A monolithic catalyst as set forth inclaim 30 wherein said high porosity silica comprises diatomaceous earth.33. A monolithic catalyst for the conversion of sulfur dioxide to sulfurtrioxide comprising a foraminous monolithic ceramic support, saidsupport having at the foraminal wall surfaces thereof a porous silicasubstrate for an active catalyst phase, and an alkali metal-vanadiumactive catalyst in the pores of said porous silica.
 34. A monolithiccatalyst as set forth in claim 33 wherein said support is produced byco-extrusion of a high surface area and a low surface area silica, saidsubstrate comprising high surface area silica at the foraminal wallsurfaces of said support.
 35. A monolithic catalyst as set forth inclaim 34 wherein said foraminous support is prepared by extruding aplasticized mixture comprising a low porosity silica powder and betweenabout 10% and about 20% by weight diatomaceous earth.
 36. A monolithiccatalyst as set forth in claim 33 wherein said alkali metal is selectedfrom the group consisting of potassium and cesium and the atomic ratioof alkali metal to vanadium in the active catalyst is between about 2:1and about 6:1.
 37. A monolithic catalyst as set forth in claim 36wherein the atomic ratio of alkali metal to vanadium in the activecatalyst is between about 3:1 and about 3.6:1.
 38. A process for thepreparation of a monolithic catalyst for the conversion of sulfurdioxide to sulfur trioxide, comprising the steps of:applying a washcoatslurry and a sol of a promoter to the foraminal wall surfaces of aforaminous support, said support being permeable to high velocity flowof a gas containing sulfur dioxide and oxygen, said washcoat slurrycomprising a high surface area silica in a sol, and said promotercomprising an oxide or silicate of a metal selected from the groupconsisting of zirconium, hafnium and titanium; drying said washcoatslurry and said promoter sol to produce a green washcoat and a promoteron the foraminal wall surfaces of said support; calcining said greenwashcoat and Promoter, thereby providing a substrate on said foraminalwall surfaces for a catalyst active phase; and depositing platinum onsaid substrate.
 39. A process as set forth in claim 38 wherein saidpromoter sol is applied after said washcoat slurry, said washcoat slurrybeing dried and the resulting green washcoat being calcined beforeapplication of said promoter sol.
 40. A process as set forth in claim 38wherein said promoter sol is incorporated in said washcoat slurry toprovide a sol slurry, the sol slurry is applied to said foraminal wallsurfaces, the sol slurry is dried on said wall surfaces to produce agreen washcoat, and the green washcoat is thereafter calcined.
 41. Aprocess as set forth in claim 40 wherein said sol slurry containsbetween about 10% and about 20% by weight of high surface area silicahaving a particle size not greater than about 20 microns.
 42. A processas set forth in claim 38 wherein said promoter sol is mixed with asilica sol containing said high surface area silica slurried therein,thereby producing a mixed sol slurry, the mixed sol slurry is applied tosaid foraminal wall surfaces, the mixed sol slurry is dried on said wallsurfaces to produce a green washcoat containing said promoter, and thegreen washcoat is thereafter calcined.
 43. A process as set forth inclaim 42 wherein said mixed sol slurry contains between about 10% andabout 20% by weight of high surface area silica having a particle sizenot greater than about 20 microns.
 44. A process as set forth in claim38 wherein an active platinum catalyst phase is deposited on saidsubstrate from a solution comprising a precursor complex selected fromthe group consisting of Pt(NH₃)₄ ⁺⁺ and Pt(SO₃)₂ OH³⁻.
 45. A process asset forth in claim 44 wherein said precursor complex comprises Pt(NH₃)₄⁺⁺ and is deposited from an aqueous solution of ammonium hydroxide, thepH of the solution being adjusted to at least about 10 to promote thedeposition of platinum.
 46. A process as set forth in claim 44 whereinsaid precursor complex comprises Pt(SO₃)₂ OH³⁻ and is deposited from asolution containing hydrogen Peroxide and having a pH of between about 1and about
 2. 47. A process as set forth in claim 44 wherein saidplatinum active phase is calcined after deposition from said solution.48. A process as set forth in claim 44 wherein said promoter is selectedfrom the group consisting of zirconia and zircon.
 49. A process as setforth in claim 38 wherein said washcoat slurry is applied to theforaminal wall surfaces of said support by dipping said support in saidslurry, said slurry containing between about 10% and about 20% by weighthigh surface area silica having a particle size not greater than about20 microns.
 50. A process as set forth in claim 38 wherein said promotersol is incorporated in said washcoat slurry to provide a sol slurrycontaining between about 10% and about 20% by weight high surface areasilica having a particle size not greater than about 20 microns, and thesol slurry is applied to said foraminal wall surfaces.
 51. A process forthe preparation of a monolithic catalyst for the oxidation of sulfurdioxide to sulfur trioxide comprising the steps of:applying a sol of apromoter to the foraminal wall surfaces of a composite foraminoussupport produced by coextrusion of a high surface area and a low surfacearea silica, said support being permeable to high velocity flow of a gascontaining sulfur dioxide and oxygen, and said promoter comprising anoxide or silicate of a metal selected from the group consisting ofzirconium, hafnium and titanium; drying said promoter sol to deposit aPromoter on the foraminal wall surfaces of said support; calcining saidpromoter on said foraminal wall surfaces, thereby providing a substratefor a catalyst active phase at said surfaces, said substrate comprisingsaid promoter and said high surface area silica; and depositing on saidsubstrate an active catalyst for the conversion of sulfur dioxide tosulfur trioxide.
 52. A process as set forth in claim 51 wherein saidcatalyst comprises platinum.
 53. A process for the preparation of amonolithic catalyst for the oxidation of sulfur dioxide to sulfurtrioxide comprising the steps of:impregnating a foraminous compositesilica substrate with a solution of vanadium compounds and alkali metalsalts activable to provide a catalyst for the conversion of sulfurdioxide to sulfur trioxide, said foraminous support having been producedby co-extrusion of a microporous high surface area and a low surfacearea silica, said support being permeable to high velocity flow of a gascontaining sulfur dioxide and oxygen; drying the impregnated support,thereby depositing an active catalyst mixture of alkali metal andvanadium compounds in the micropores of said microporous silica;contacting the surfaces of said active catalyst mixture with a stream ofair containing an oxide of sulfur selected from the group consisting ofsulfur dioxide and sulfur trioxide at temperature above about 400° C. toactivate the catalyst.
 54. A process as set forth in claim 53 whereinsaid vanadium compound is selected from the group consisting of vanadylsulfate, ammonium vanadate, and alkali metal vanadates.
 55. A process asset forth in claim 54 wherein said solution contains cesium andpotassium ions and anions selected from the group consisting of sulfate,carbonate, hydroxide, nitrite and nitrate.
 56. A monolithic catalyst forthe conversion of sulfur dioxide to sulfur trioxide comprising aforaminous monolithic ceramic support, a silica washcoat on theforaminal wall surfaces of said support and bound to said walls by acalcined silica sol, and a platinum active phase on said washcoat.
 57. Amonolithic catalyst for the conversion of sulfur dioxide to sulfurtrioxide comprising a foraminous monolithic ceramic support, saidsupport having at the foraminal wall surfaces thereof a high surfacearea substrate for an active catalyst phase, and a highly dispersedplatinum active phase on said substrate, said platinum active phasehaving been deposited on said substrate from a solution containing aprecursor complex selected from the group consisting of Pt(NH₃)₄ ⁺⁺ andPt(SO₃)₂ OH³⁻.